1997
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03312.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Locking to High Frequencies in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl,Tyto alba

Abstract: The auditory system of the barn owl is an important model for temporal processing on a very fast time scale and for the neural mechanisms and circuitry underlying sound localization. Phase locking has been shown to be the behaviorally relevant temporal code. This study examined the quality and intensity dependence of phase locking in single auditory nerve fibers of the barn owl to define the input to the known brainstem circuit for temporal processing. For direct comparison in the same individuals, recordings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
228
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
15
228
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We can rule out sound level as the major source of differences as similar plots at a given input level showed the same clustering. It is well known, however, that increasing sound level leads to shorter group delays (Köppl 1997b;Temchin and Ruggero 2010;Versteegh et al 2011), and this was also evident in the current dataset (−166±90 μs/10 dB). Therefore, in order to perform a valid comparison with data reported for mammals, we plot the power law regression of the barn owl group delays together with those of two mammalian species, chinchilla ) and gerbil (Versteegh et al 2011) (all obtained close to their respective thresholds).…”
Section: Phase and Delay Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can rule out sound level as the major source of differences as similar plots at a given input level showed the same clustering. It is well known, however, that increasing sound level leads to shorter group delays (Köppl 1997b;Temchin and Ruggero 2010;Versteegh et al 2011), and this was also evident in the current dataset (−166±90 μs/10 dB). Therefore, in order to perform a valid comparison with data reported for mammals, we plot the power law regression of the barn owl group delays together with those of two mammalian species, chinchilla ) and gerbil (Versteegh et al 2011) (all obtained close to their respective thresholds).…”
Section: Phase and Delay Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The group delay, defined as the negative of the derivative of the phase with respect to frequency, is a widely used measure of the transmission time between outer ear and AN fibers (Köppl 1997b;Recio-Spinoso et al 2005;Versteegh et al 2011). Because most of the phase-frequency curves were non-linear (Fig.…”
Section: Phase and Delay Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interaural (inter-ear) time differences have been shown [1] to be their only cue. The spatial resolution implies a temporal precision at least as good as 40 ms [2,3].We focus on the laminar nucleus as the first station in the brain receiving input from both ears. Interaural time differences (ITDs) are represented there by means of a place code.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaural (inter-ear) time differences have been shown [1] to be their only cue. The spatial resolution implies a temporal precision at least as good as 40 ms [2,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%