1994
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase III trial of recombinant interferon gamma in complete responders with small-cell lung cancer.

Abstract: Time to progression and survival were inferior in patients treated with rIFN-gamma compared with randomized control subjects, although this difference was not statistically significant. These data indicate that rIFN-gamma treatment is not associated with a 33% improvement in survival (P = .04). Because of the high rate of relapse, SCLC patients in CR are an ideal group in which to evaluate novel and minimally toxic agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a phase III trial of IFNg plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for treating advanced ovarian carcinomas was stopped early due to the significantly shorter overall survival (OS) time of the patients receiving IFNg (22). Similarly, the time to progression and survival were inferior (although nonsignificantly) in patients treated with IFNg compared with the outcomes of randomized control subjects in a trial including patients with small cell lung cancer with complete response following chemotherapy (23). These results indicate that the effects of IFNg on tumor suppression are inconsistent and that IFNg can even be detrimental depending upon the type of tumor and treatment protocol.…”
Section: Inconsistent Clinical Results Regarding the Effects Of Ifngmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a phase III trial of IFNg plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for treating advanced ovarian carcinomas was stopped early due to the significantly shorter overall survival (OS) time of the patients receiving IFNg (22). Similarly, the time to progression and survival were inferior (although nonsignificantly) in patients treated with IFNg compared with the outcomes of randomized control subjects in a trial including patients with small cell lung cancer with complete response following chemotherapy (23). These results indicate that the effects of IFNg on tumor suppression are inconsistent and that IFNg can even be detrimental depending upon the type of tumor and treatment protocol.…”
Section: Inconsistent Clinical Results Regarding the Effects Of Ifngmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these mediators have proved to be effective in some malignancies, their activity in NSCLC seems to be rather marginal [135][136][137][138]. In SCLC, a recently published phase III study did not confirm the positive role of IFN-α and IFN-γ as maintenance therapy in complete responder patients [139,140]. However, complete tumour responses were observed after intrapleural injection of IFN-γ in stage I and II mesothelioma patients [141].…”
Section: Cytokines Associated or Not With Adoptive Immunotherapy (Tabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunotherapy of lung cancer has been actively pursued in recent years (Bunn, 1999). However, randomised trials using nonspecific immune stimulants such as interferon have failed to show significant effects on lung cancer survival (Jett et al, 1994;van Zandwijk et al, 1997). Most pioneering studies of targeted cancer vaccine therapy have focused on melanoma, which is the most immunogenic solid tumour and has abundantly expressed melanoma-specific gene products.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%