2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase III Trial of Cetuximab, Bevacizumab, and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin vs. FOLFOX-Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Phase III clinical trials have shown that the addition of cetuximab to bevacizumab and chemotherapy did not improve the survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer compared to bevacizumab and chemotherapy alone. [22][23][24] These findings were unexpected as preclinical studies using combination therapy targeting both angiogenesis and EGFR showed encouraging results. [14][15][16][17] However, none of these early preclinical studies used the combination of bevacizumab and cetuximab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Phase III clinical trials have shown that the addition of cetuximab to bevacizumab and chemotherapy did not improve the survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer compared to bevacizumab and chemotherapy alone. [22][23][24] These findings were unexpected as preclinical studies using combination therapy targeting both angiogenesis and EGFR showed encouraging results. [14][15][16][17] However, none of these early preclinical studies used the combination of bevacizumab and cetuximab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Therefore, the combination of chemotherapy with anti-EGFR antibodies has been studied in Phase III clinical trials. The combination of chemotherapy and bevacizumab with cetuximab 22,23 or panitumumab 24 did not result in improved progression-free survival compared to patients who received chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone. The study of Hecht et al 24 even showed a significantly reduced survival for patients receiving the combination of antibodies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the inclusion criteria of each trial, patients were required to have adequate hepatic, renal and hematological function. Underlying malignancies included colorectal cancer (eleven trials) [14,15,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], non-small-cell lung cancer (seven trials) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], head and neck cancer (four trials) [5,13,39,40], breast cancer (one trial) [41], urothelial carcinoma (one trial) [42], pancreatic cancer (one trial) [43] and esophagogastric cancer (one trial) [44].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesized that inconsistencies in outcomes with mAbs could also be related to their high specificity, which may make them susceptible to resistance through redundant signaling pathways (11). Attempts to broaden activity by combining different mAbs have not proven fruitful in mCRC (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%