2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo (P)-controlled trial of rilotumumab (R) plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive (pos) gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer: RILOMET-1 study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, multiple phase III trials of agents aiming to target MET signaling have recently failed (5-7). However, the identification of oncogenic MET alterations in subsets of lung cancers has again led to increased interest in targeting this oncoprotein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, multiple phase III trials of agents aiming to target MET signaling have recently failed (5-7). However, the identification of oncogenic MET alterations in subsets of lung cancers has again led to increased interest in targeting this oncoprotein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite solid preclinical evidence and promising phase 1/2 clinical trial results [43][44][45][46], several approaches to address RTK-related signaling pathways like EGFR, cMET/HGF, and mTOR failed in recent phase 3 studies [47][48][49][50][51]. This failure demonstrates our incomplete understanding of oncogenic pathways in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Growth Factor-related Signaling Pathways Beyond Her2mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In recent years, a series of large randomized Phase III trials of targeted therapy in nonbiomarker-selected patients have yielded negative results. These have included agents targeting the EGFR, MET, mTOR pathways [28][29][30][31][32]. This approach, in the absence of patient selection using validated biomarker associated with pathway activation, has clearly failed.…”
Section: Low Prevalence and Heterogeneous Biomarkers Require Smarter Trmentioning
confidence: 96%