1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980401)82:7<1250::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II trial of chemoembolization for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver and review of the literature

Abstract: Chemoembolization is a feasible treatment modality for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastasis to the liver who have experienced failure with other systemic treatments. It results in high response rates with transient mild-to-moderate toxicity. Responses are measured in months, however, and all patients have eventual progression of disease. Patients who are able to undergo three or more chemoembolization procedures may receive the most clinical benefit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
73
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the impact of embolization on the patency of arteries directly responsible for feeding the tumor has not been evaluated. Whereas some studies have reported excellent results with embolization alone (mostly against neuroendocrine tumors), others support the use of chemotherapy as a part of a cocktail, containing an oily vehicle and embolic particles, delivered to the tumor [6,25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of embolization on the patency of arteries directly responsible for feeding the tumor has not been evaluated. Whereas some studies have reported excellent results with embolization alone (mostly against neuroendocrine tumors), others support the use of chemotherapy as a part of a cocktail, containing an oily vehicle and embolic particles, delivered to the tumor [6,25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in neuroendocrine patients, the absence of underlying cirrhosis reduces the expected morbidity. Chemoembolization for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer appears to be a reasonable alternative for many who are not surgical candidates [109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116]. Survival may be especially enhanced in treated patients who have no extrahepatic metastases [117].…”
Section: Colorectal Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To date, embolization was achieved either with encoated drugs (microcapsules) (Kato et al, 1996) or with concomitant delivery of embolizing substances like polyvinyl alcohol, lipiodol, albumine, degradable starch microspheres using mixtures, sometimes with several drugs (Tellez et al, 1998;Vogl et al, 2000;Yamamoto et al, 2000). These protocols have certain advantages: microcapsules provide good reproducibility of the product with good control of particle diameter, and a pharmacologically adjusted time of drug release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At concentrations higher than 1 mg ml 71 precipitation occurs and cisplatin is not dissolved totally. The use of a concentrated injection seemed justified for two reasons: the absolute dose of cisplatin remained the same as in the well established settings of intra-arterial chemotherapy of more than 300 head and neck cancer patients (KovĂĄcs et al, 1999;Robbins et al, 2000), and highly concentrated mixtures of cisplatin with embolizing agents with same or larger particle diameters were used for decades in the treatment of patients with liver cancer and metastases (Tellez et al, 1998;Yamamoto et al, 2000). The high concentrations up to 10 mg cisplatin in 1 ml lipiodol (Yamamoto et al, 2000) or other embolizing agents were empirically motivated and had no pharmacological foundation.…”
Section: Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%