2006
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.05.9212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II Trial Evaluating the Palliative Benefit of Second-Line Zoledronic Acid in Breast Cancer Patients With Either a Skeletal-Related Event or Progressive Bone Metastases Despite First-Line Bisphosphonate Therapy

Abstract: This is the first study to demonstrate that patients with either progressive bone metastases or SREs while on clodronate or pamidronate can have relevant palliative benefits with a switch to the more potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid. This is reflected by significant improvements in pain control and bone turnover markers. If confirmed in randomized trials, these findings have major implications to the use of bisphosphonates in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
88
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
88
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because patients with bone-only metastatic disease may survive several years, and the risk of adverse events from bisphosphonates increases with cumulative exposure, several ongoing trials are exploring the possibility that more infrequent bisphosphonate doses may be as effective as standard doses 47,48 . In addition, small phase ii trials have explored the strategy of switching to novel or more potent agents for patients at high risk of further sres on a bisphosphonate 49,50 . In one of those trials 49 , 31 patients who experienced either a sre or progressive bone metastases while receiving clodronate or pamidronate were switched to zoledronate, a more potent bisphosphonate; after 8 weeks, pain control had improved significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because patients with bone-only metastatic disease may survive several years, and the risk of adverse events from bisphosphonates increases with cumulative exposure, several ongoing trials are exploring the possibility that more infrequent bisphosphonate doses may be as effective as standard doses 47,48 . In addition, small phase ii trials have explored the strategy of switching to novel or more potent agents for patients at high risk of further sres on a bisphosphonate 49,50 . In one of those trials 49 , 31 patients who experienced either a sre or progressive bone metastases while receiving clodronate or pamidronate were switched to zoledronate, a more potent bisphosphonate; after 8 weeks, pain control had improved significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Urinary NTx levels are indeed increased in patients with solid tumors and BM, and usually decrease after bisphosphonate therapy. 11,12 Interestingly, patients in whom urinary NTx levels do not decrease after initial bisphosphonate therapy may be at higher risk of skeletal adverse events such as pathological fractures, and may be candidates for a switch to more potent bisphosphonates. 12 NTx can also be measured in serum, as a biochemical marker of bone resorption, with similar results to those obtained with urinary NTx.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Interestingly, patients in whom urinary NTx levels do not decrease after initial bisphosphonate therapy may be at higher risk of skeletal adverse events such as pathological fractures, and may be candidates for a switch to more potent bisphosphonates. 12 NTx can also be measured in serum, as a biochemical marker of bone resorption, with similar results to those obtained with urinary NTx. 7,13 NTx assays in serum may be more convenient than urine assays, since blood can be drawn simultaneously for all other routine biochemical and hematological tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bisphosphonates can potently reduce telopeptide levels, 32,33 which correlate well with reduced pain. 34,35 Patients in this study had already been treated with bisphosphonates for a mean duration of 15.2 months and it is possible that these patients had therefore already experienced the maximal suppression of their bone turnover. If suppression was maximal, then neither telopeptide levels nor pain scores would be expected to change as a result of a high dose of vitamin D. It should be emphasized that patients in this study were administered different bisphosphonates, and these were given both orally and intravenously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%