2009
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II study of sunitinib in men with advanced prostate cancer

Abstract: Sunitinib monotherapy resulted in few confirmed 50% post-treatment declines in PSA in men with CRPC. Serum markers of angiogenesis confirmed on-target effects of sunitinib. Assessments of radiographic disease status were often discordant with changes in PSA, indicating that alternate end points are important in future trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
99
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the renal cell carcinoma population, there is probably a higher incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw when IVBP therapy for bone metastases is combined with sunitinib (or sorafenib) than when IVBP is used alone; the mechanism for the increased risk remains unclear (Beuselinck et al 2012). Possible etiologies for osteonecrosis of the jaw as a side effect in this population relate to the anti-angiogenic effects of sunitinib or antiresorptive activity, the latter which has been demonstrated by Sahi et al in a small number of patients with RCC metastatic to bone and in a study of prostate cancer patients metastatic to bone (Dror Michaelson et al 2009, Sahi et al 2009, Agrillo et al 2012, Baldazzi et al 2012, Beuselinck et al 2012.…”
Section: Vegf Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the renal cell carcinoma population, there is probably a higher incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw when IVBP therapy for bone metastases is combined with sunitinib (or sorafenib) than when IVBP is used alone; the mechanism for the increased risk remains unclear (Beuselinck et al 2012). Possible etiologies for osteonecrosis of the jaw as a side effect in this population relate to the anti-angiogenic effects of sunitinib or antiresorptive activity, the latter which has been demonstrated by Sahi et al in a small number of patients with RCC metastatic to bone and in a study of prostate cancer patients metastatic to bone (Dror Michaelson et al 2009, Sahi et al 2009, Agrillo et al 2012, Baldazzi et al 2012, Beuselinck et al 2012.…”
Section: Vegf Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In colorectal cancer patients with metastatic disease, PlGF levels increased following the administration of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation (26,27). VEGF-A and PlGF levels increased following sunitinib treatment in patients with bevacizumab-refractory metastatic RCC and in men with advanced prostate cancer who were treated with sunitinib (28,29). It has been proposed that PlGF plays a role in resistance to antiangiogenic therapies and that an antibody against PlGF may help overcome resistance to VEGF receptor inhibitors (30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum PlGF levels increased in colorectal cancer patients following bevacizumab therapy (22,23). Similar observations have been made in patients with metastatic RCC who no longer responded to bevacizumab or in patients with prostate cancer who were treated with sunitinib (24,25). The administration of sFLT01 to patients with elevated serum PlGF levels could offer a novel approach to neutralize PlGF that may be contributing to drug resistance and tumor escape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In colorectal cancer patients with metastatic disease, serum PlGF levels increased following the administration of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation (22,23). VEGF-A and PlGF levels increased following sunitinib treatment in patients with bevacizumab-refractory metastatic RCC and in men with advanced prostate cancer who were treated with sunitinib (24,25). Thus, PlGF may have a role in resistance to certain antiangiogenic therapies and its neutralization may overcome resistance to VEGF receptor inhibitors (26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%