2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-II Study of Docetaxel, Estramustine Phosphate, and Carboplatin in Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that treatment with DGP is better than single agent docetaxel for patients with CRMPC, and hypothesise that, in a clinical setting in which DGP treatment is introduced immediately after the diagnosis of metastatic, CRPC disease, even if the patient being asymptomatic, the DGP treatment probably would improve overall survival and PSA response. Nobuyuki et al reported that levels of PSA decreased by more than 50% in 95% of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer and a median overall survival of 26.6 months, when treated with docetaxel, estramustine phosphate and carpoplatin [22]. This study and similar phase II studies of combination chemotherapy for CRMPC patients have proven effective and with acceptable toxicity [23,24] and thus warrants further studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We believe that treatment with DGP is better than single agent docetaxel for patients with CRMPC, and hypothesise that, in a clinical setting in which DGP treatment is introduced immediately after the diagnosis of metastatic, CRPC disease, even if the patient being asymptomatic, the DGP treatment probably would improve overall survival and PSA response. Nobuyuki et al reported that levels of PSA decreased by more than 50% in 95% of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer and a median overall survival of 26.6 months, when treated with docetaxel, estramustine phosphate and carpoplatin [22]. This study and similar phase II studies of combination chemotherapy for CRMPC patients have proven effective and with acceptable toxicity [23,24] and thus warrants further studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…When used alone to treat HRPC, it has shown response rates ranging from 19% to 69% (1). EM has also shown promising activity against HRPC in combination with other drugs and is currently undergoing clinical trials in combination with docetaxel, etoposide, carboplatin, and vinblastine (2,3). Fizazi and colleagues (2007) have reported that the overall survival rate for metastatic HRPC is significantly increased when EM is combined with docetaxel, paclitaxel, vinblastine, or ixabepilone rather than used by itself (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the Oh et al [15] Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial, patients may have received prior chemotherapy, and 16% of patients across all trials were reported to have received prior chemotherapy. In the Kelly et al [12] and Solit et al [14] trials, estramustine-and taxanebased regimens were allowed, and in the Urakami et al [13] and Kikuno et al [18] trials, most chemotherapy-treated patients received estramustinebased regimens. The majority of patients were enrolled from June 1997 to December 2001, with only the Oh et al [16] Individual patient-level data were requested for the seven trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%