2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.2520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of INC280 in patients with advanced MET-dependent solid tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capmatinib (INC280) is an oral, highly selective and potent MET inhibitor that is well tolerated and has shown clinical activity in advanced solid tumors (36,37). Phase I and II clinical trials are ongoing to investigate the efficacy of capmatinib in cancers including melanoma, HCC, NSCLC, glioblastoma, colorectal cancer, and papillary renal cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capmatinib (INC280) is an oral, highly selective and potent MET inhibitor that is well tolerated and has shown clinical activity in advanced solid tumors (36,37). Phase I and II clinical trials are ongoing to investigate the efficacy of capmatinib in cancers including melanoma, HCC, NSCLC, glioblastoma, colorectal cancer, and papillary renal cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phase I, dose‐escalation study was conducted in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed despite standard therapy or for whom no effective therapy exists. The expansion was not initiated because sufficient data for further development were already available from other clinical studies of capmatinib …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capsule formulation at 600 mg b.i.d. was initially selected as the RP2D . A tablet formulation was subsequently developed to improve patient compliance, as this allowed for higher dosage strengths and therefore fewer tablets compared with capsules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in a small series, the objective response rate (ORR) to crizotinib (a MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor) dramatically differed between cases with different MET /CEP7 ratios (ratio ≥1.8−≤2.2 ORR 0%; ratio >2.2−<5 ORR 17%; ratio ≥5 ORR 67%) (24). In EGFR mutant NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs, the ORR to the combination of an EGFR inhibitor and a MET inhibitor (INC280) was 0% among those with a mean MET /cell of <5 and 40% among those with mean MET /cell ≥5 (30). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%