Introduction
MET gene copy number gain (CNG) may be a predictive biomarker for MET inhibition in lung cancer, but the most appropriate method and criteria for defining MET positivity are uncertain.
Methods
MET copy number was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in lung adenocarcinoma. Positivity criteria included mean MET/cell ≥5 (low ≥5 – <6, intermediate ≥6 –<7, high ≥7) and MET/CEP7 ratio ≥1.8 (low ≥1.8 – ≤2.2, intermediate >2.2 – < 5, high ≥5). Associated clinical and molecular characteristics were captured.
Results
99/686 cases (14%) had mean MET/cell ≥ 5, 52/1164 (4.5%) had MET/CEP7 ≥1.8. Other oncogenic drivers (in EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ERBB2, BRAF, NRAS, ROS1 or RET) were detectable in 56% of the mean MET/cell ≥ 5 group and 47% of the MET/CEP 7 ratio ≥1.8 group, suggesting many MET ‘positive’ cases are not truly MET-addicted. Concomitant drivers in low, indeterminate and high categories of mean MET/cell were 32/52 (62%), 12/19 (63%) and 11/27 (41%) (p=0.2) and in MET/CEP7: 15/29 (52%), 9/18 (50%) and 0/4 (0%) respectively (p=0.04). MET/CEP7 ≥1.8, in the absence of other oncogenes, was associated with a higher rate of adrenal metastases (p=0.03), but not with never smoking status.
Conclusions
FISH MET/CEP7 ≥ 5 defined a MET ‘positive’ group with no oncogenic overlap. As this method and criteria are also associated with the highest response rate to MET inhibition it represents the clearest definition of a MET CNG-addicted state. However, a MET-associated phenotype may also exist across MET/CEP7 ≥ 1.8 cases when no other oncogene overlap occurs.