2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I study of temsirolimus in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,36 Moreover, the therapy targeted against MTOR has been considered an important anticancer strategy. 37,38 Taken together, our results further suggest that the MTORC1 variants may be also involved in tumor progression, exerting an impact on cancer patients' survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,36 Moreover, the therapy targeted against MTOR has been considered an important anticancer strategy. 37,38 Taken together, our results further suggest that the MTORC1 variants may be also involved in tumor progression, exerting an impact on cancer patients' survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Third, MTORC1 is involved in the regulation of autophagy, a common biological process in cells that is associated with cancer progression . Moreover, the therapy targeted against MTOR has been considered an important anti‐cancer strategy . Taken together, our results further suggest that the MTORC1 variants may be also involved in tumor progression, exerting an impact on cancer patients’ survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Although temsirolimus is well tolerated as a single agent, phase I combination studies including temsirolimus have frequently been found to have significant toxicities . Oral mucositis was the predominant toxicity in a pediatric phase I combination of temsirolimus with cixutumumab, resulting in two grade 3 mucositis DLTs and required two dose deescalations to achieve a RP2D (temsirolimus 8 mg/m 2 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Although temsirolimus is well tolerated as a single agent, phase I combination studies including temsirolimus have frequently been found to have significant toxicities. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Oral mucositis was the predominant toxicity in a pediatric phase I combination of temsirolimus with cixutumumab, resulting in two grade 3 mucositis DLTs and required two dose deescalations to achieve a RP2D (temsirolimus 8 mg/m 2 ). 19 Significant oral mucositis and hypertriglyceridemia, accounting for four DLTS, occurred in a pediatric study of temsirolimus (15 mg/m 2 weekly) with vinorelbine and cyclophosphamide for rhabdomyosarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase I study of temsirolimus with the c-Met inhibitor tivantinib for the treatment of various advanced solid tumors, the combination treatment was well tolerated and had some clinical activity [247]. In a phase I study of combination temsirolimus with cetuximab (anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) for treatment of advanced solid tumors, clinical activity was modest and thus not further pursued [248]. A combination of temsirolimus with the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab and cetuximab had partial responses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with numerous toxicities [249].…”
Section: Co-targeting Mtorc1 and Growth Factor Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%