The cone biopsy described in the case series discussed by Mulhem et al 1 touches on several key issues in cervical cancer prevention and within the scope of practice of family physicians. In the current medical environment health care reform to bolster primary care to reduce health care costs are being proposed; such internal discussions within the family medicine community are timely and germane to reform.2-5 The role of family medicine specialists in implementing and translating technological advances in science into clinical practice is undervalued and unappreciated within the medical system hierarchy. 6 There is a need for family physicians to lead the way in adopting and implementing such new technologies into clinical practice and generating implementation, service, and patientrelated outcomes data, which evidence rigorous evaluation within real-world settings.
The Big PictureIn the United States and other developed countries, cervical cancer prevention with organized screening programs is actively taking new shape. Since the 1950s and the widespread use of Papanicolaou smear screening there has been a decline in the number of cervical cancers in the United States, with 11,070 invasive cervical cancers detected in 2008 and 4,070 deaths. 7 Concurrent to the decrease in cervical cancer is an observed increase in the detection of cervical precancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Screening practices using cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) typing has lead to the detection of an estimated 20 million women in the United States who are already infected with HPV and 1.875 million women infected with CIN per year. In addition, Papanicolaou smear detects 2 million women with atypical squamous cells of unknown significance. 8 This process has lead to large numbers of women who are seen within family practices nationwide who need intervention after being diagnosed with a non-lifethreatening precancer.
HPV VaccineThe prophylactic L1 subunit HPV vaccine is one of the technological advance of this century. However, administration of the vaccine and its implementation into clinical practice has been poorly accepted, particularly among target populations including minority women with a high prevalence of HPV infection. The true potential of this vaccine has not been realized because of imperfect penetration within the community and subpar vaccination of the US population.9 Assuming that translational science in clinical implementation accrues in HPV vaccine delivery, leading to significant increases in populations that have been vaccinated against HPV, there still are expected to be millions of US women who are already infected with the HPV and thus at risk for CIN. In addition, the vaccine contains 2 of the many HPV subtypes that cause dysplasia and cancer, leaving women unprotected against other HPV strains that account for 30% of cervical disease. Thus, in the foreseeable future there will be a need to refine the management of CIN within primary care and will require judicious consultation with our ...