2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:1(3)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I IASC-ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem Using Simulated Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
217
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results revealed that there is a good agreement between the actual and estimated damage of the benchmark structure. Geometry of the benchmark structure [24] Furthermore, Table 4 provides comparison between the obtained results from the presented method in this paper and energy index method proposed by Sharifi and Banan [25]. As it is shown, the damages obtained by the proposed model are closer to actual damages compared to the energy index method.…”
Section: Iasc-asce Benchmark Structurementioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results revealed that there is a good agreement between the actual and estimated damage of the benchmark structure. Geometry of the benchmark structure [24] Furthermore, Table 4 provides comparison between the obtained results from the presented method in this paper and energy index method proposed by Sharifi and Banan [25]. As it is shown, the damages obtained by the proposed model are closer to actual damages compared to the energy index method.…”
Section: Iasc-asce Benchmark Structurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…12. Details of the first phase of IASC-ASCE benchmark problem was presented by Johnson et al [24]. The proposed method is applied to case 1 of this phase benchmark problem, and the finite element model of the 12 DOF shear building model is used.…”
Section: Iasc-asce Benchmark Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers (Ching and Beck, 2004;Johnson et al, 2004;Kharrazi et al, 2002;Mikami et al, 2007) have investigated methods of SHM/damage diagnosis for the scaled fourstorey, two-by-two bay, steel braced frame ASCE structural health monitoring task group benchmark damage structure (IASC-ASCE, 1999). Varying levels of damage scenarios were tested, with damage consisting of removal of single or multiple brace members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate and compare the performance of current and future damage detection methodologies, a powerful structural health monitoring benchmark study has been devised that offers an extensive data set collected from a full-scale laboratory structure tested under ambient and forced vibrations. Since the public release of the IASC-ASCE Task Group on Structural Health Monitoring's benchmark study, a number of researchers have tested the efficacy of their damage detection strategies on the data set (Johnson et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%