2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9535-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 3′-C-ethynylcytidine (TAS-106), an inhibitor of RNA polymerase I, II and III,in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Abstract: The recommended phase II dose of TAS-106 is 4.21 mg/m(2). However, due to a cumulative drug-related peripheral sensory neuropathy that proved to be dose-limiting, further evaluation of this bolus every 21 day infusion schedule will not be pursued and instead, an alternate dosing schedule of TAS-106 administered as a continuous 24-hour infusion will be explored to decrease C(max) in efforts to minimize peripheral neuropathy and maximize antitumor activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concluded that the safety profile of TAS-106 administered via weekly 4-hour intravenous infusion is similar to the toxicity profile of TAS-106 when administered as a weekly bolus; peripheral neuropathy was acceptable at the recommended phase II dose. Infusion regimens of TAS-106 were further evaluated in another clinical trial [41] in order to characterize the drug safety profile and identify a phase II dose. A review of the safety and drug exposure data from this trial suggested that the best regimen for phase II testing was TAS-106 administered as a 24-hour infusion.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that the safety profile of TAS-106 administered via weekly 4-hour intravenous infusion is similar to the toxicity profile of TAS-106 when administered as a weekly bolus; peripheral neuropathy was acceptable at the recommended phase II dose. Infusion regimens of TAS-106 were further evaluated in another clinical trial [41] in order to characterize the drug safety profile and identify a phase II dose. A review of the safety and drug exposure data from this trial suggested that the best regimen for phase II testing was TAS-106 administered as a 24-hour infusion.…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the other safety concerns closely monitored on this trial was based on prior observations in the early phase I trials of significant peripheral neuropathy and neurologic AEs. In this phase II trial, there was only one patient who reported grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, which suggests that the 24‐h continuous infusion schedule of administration was successful in limiting the amount of neurologic toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four early clinical trials have assessed the safety and tolerability of bolus and infusional schedules for TAS‐106 . Hammond‐Thelin et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TAS-106 has been tested in multiple phase I and phase II clinical trials. The phase I studies have concluded that TAS-106 can be administered either as an infusion or as a bolus injection, and that the main dose-limiting adverse effect is its neurotoxicity (Friday et al, 2012;Hammond-Thelin et al, 2012;Naing et al, 2014). So far, the phase II clinical trials have not shown significant benefits for TAS-106 monotherapy and no new clinical trials have been started in the last years because of the lack of efficacy and the possibility of adverse effects (Tsao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tas-106mentioning
confidence: 99%