2016
DOI: 10.1364/josab.33.000903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-front curvature effects on nematicon generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past several years, relevant improvements have been made in both technology (better control of the input interface, see [9]) and modeling (accounting, e.g., for walkoff [10][11][12]). Our results establish a good quantitative agreement between experimental data and the modified SMM [2], as recently shown in [13]. Finally, the results from our group have been experimentally validated by several groups [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Overall Replysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past several years, relevant improvements have been made in both technology (better control of the input interface, see [9]) and modeling (accounting, e.g., for walkoff [10][11][12]). Our results establish a good quantitative agreement between experimental data and the modified SMM [2], as recently shown in [13]. Finally, the results from our group have been experimentally validated by several groups [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Overall Replysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Better models and approximations can be implemented later. Along this path, we recently elaborated a corrected SMM able to model quantitatively light propagation [13,60]. In doing so, we also tried to understand the limits of this approximation by direct comparison with experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The factor 2 of difference may be due to the overestimation of the scattering in the oneconstant approximation. The same order of magnitude can be found in the literature [2,33], even if no dependence on the nematicon power is reported there. On the same graph, as a comparison, we also show the losses obtained for the case of uncorrelated noise, for which almost no dependence on the nematicon power is observed.…”
Section: Numerical Nematicon Propagationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly treated thin cover slides sealed the cell orthogonally to z and provided molecular anchoring along y. A doped NLC mixture, comprising 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl (5CB) as the host NLC and photo-polymerizable compound(s) as the guest dopants, was infiltrated into the cell by capillarity (e.g., as in Karimi et al [27] ). A y-polarized Gaussian input beam of wavelength λ=1.064 μm and waist of about 4 μm was launched in the mid-plane of the sample (at 50μm…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%