1993
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.48.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-field models for anisotropic interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
214
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
214
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the phase-field model is phenomenological, it needs to be validated by mapping onto a free-boundary problem of interest, i.e., a sharp-interface model. In early works, the mapping was achieved in the sharp-interface limit, where the interface thickness W was made extremely small [5,6]. However, a huge computational cost is required when a small value is assigned to W. Hence, it is common practice to employ a value of W several orders of magnitude larger than the realistic interface thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the phase-field model is phenomenological, it needs to be validated by mapping onto a free-boundary problem of interest, i.e., a sharp-interface model. In early works, the mapping was achieved in the sharp-interface limit, where the interface thickness W was made extremely small [5,6]. However, a huge computational cost is required when a small value is assigned to W. Hence, it is common practice to employ a value of W several orders of magnitude larger than the realistic interface thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was originally proposed for simulating the dendrite growth from an undercooled pure melt and has been extended to solidification of alloys. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] By adopting the thin interface limit to derive the phase-field mobility, the applicability of the phase-field model is considerably widened. 15,16) Since the thermal diffusivity is much larger than the solutal one in metal system, for example three hundred times difference in Fe-C alloy system, the effect of heat transfer has been regards as negligibly small comparing to that of solute in the existing phase-field calculations for alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropic Allen-Cahn equation [19,20] is then derived from the linear response of the interface to the local drive given by the Gibbs-Thompson condition, [σ(ψ) + σ ′′ (ψ)]κ, were σ is the surface tension, and κ the local interface curvature. The stiffness, σ + σ ′′ , reflects the local change of extent and orientation of the interface due to a deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%