2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-015-1352-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-Field Modeling of Microstructure Evolution in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 24, the final configurations resulting from different scan speeds are depicted. As expected and in agreement with experiments considered in [51], the higher cooling rates induced by higher scan velocities result in a higher nucleation density and, eventually, in a finer grain structure, which is still oriented in the build direction.…”
Section: Microscopic Simulation Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 24, the final configurations resulting from different scan speeds are depicted. As expected and in agreement with experiments considered in [51], the higher cooling rates induced by higher scan velocities result in a higher nucleation density and, eventually, in a finer grain structure, which is still oriented in the build direction.…”
Section: Microscopic Simulation Modelssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Only a few approaches to microstructure modeling can be found for SLM/EBM, all of them restricted to 2D. In Gong et al [51], the solidification and growth of primary β-phase grains during the EBM processing of Ti-6Al-4V has been studied. Thereto, a phase field model similar to (14) has been employed with c representing the concentration of Ti and 1 − c the concentration of the solute, treated as the combination of Al and V. Thus, the ternary alloy Ti-6Al-4V has been simplified as a binary system, and the influence of grain orientation by means of a parameter Ψ has not been considered.…”
Section: Microscopic Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modeling of such a multi-physics phenomenon is extremely difficult within a feasible computational time and resources. Therefore, laser melting processes with a relatively low power beam are often modeled using finite element methods with simplified assumptions of the melt pool dynamics in order to simplify calculations without any qualitative changes in the resultant melt pool shapes [6,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an open model, the phase-field model can be coupled with various external fields such as temperature, dissolution, gravity, and fluid fields, and can effectively combine the microscale with the macroscale. With the development of the phase-field model and improvements in computing technology, quantitatively simulating and predicting the microstructure in the phase transition of actual materials by using PFM has become the focus of research into this aspect of material structures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%