2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4796098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-field modeling of martensitic microstructure with inhomogeneous elasticity

Abstract: A phase-field model accounting for elastic inhomogeneity is established for microstructure study in martensitic materials. It is motivated by Hashin-Shtrikman variational formulation by introducing a homogeneous comparison medium and a polarized stress field. As a result, the driving force due to stress can be computed in the equivalent homogeneous medium since it is formally identical to that in the actual inhomogeneous solid. The model is applied to the simulations of three-dimensional self-accommodation pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anisotropy, the habit is a constant plane, which is consistent with the classic WLR and BM theory . In the last few decades, the phase field method has shown tremendous capabilities of predicting Martensitic phase transformation . When the martensite transformation model is solved based on the phase field method, the values of various parameters will directly affect the final calculation results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Anisotropy, the habit is a constant plane, which is consistent with the classic WLR and BM theory . In the last few decades, the phase field method has shown tremendous capabilities of predicting Martensitic phase transformation . When the martensite transformation model is solved based on the phase field method, the values of various parameters will directly affect the final calculation results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…is the algorithmically consistent phase-inherent effective stiffness tensor (in terms of t), which, by the discussion of Eqs. (23) and (24), is symmetric and positive (semi-)definite.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Phase-inherent Visco-elastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly different procedure is proposed by Khachaturyan [21], who suggests to use the VT scheme for elastic strains, and to treat inelastic strains by the RS scheme. More recently, the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds [22] (HS, which are second-order bounds while VT and RS are first-order bounds) have been applied by Chen and Shu [23] to simulate martensitic phase transformations. Durga et al [24] examined how VT and RS schemes lead to excess stress, strain and elastic energy in diffuse interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different methods used for the modeling of the microstructure evolution in technological processes. The models based on cellular automata (CA) (Łach and Svyetlichnyy, 2014; Zhu et al , 2016), Monte Carlo Potts (Rodgers et al , 2017; Tan et al , 2017), the finite element method (Torabian et al , 2016; Umbrello et al , 2016), the phase-field method (Chen and Shu, 2013; Koyama, 2008), the level set method (Hallberg, 2013; Scholtes et al , 2016) and the vertex models (Barrales Mora, 2010; Tamaki et al , 2015) are among them. The application of the CA models for the simulation of the different phenomena in the materials has been significantly increased these days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%