Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase field microelasticity model of dislocation climb: Methodology and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we believe that these boundary conditions are reasonable approximations. The equilibrium boundary condition for vacancy is equivalent to treating the dislocation as a perfect sink, which have been used in prior works 26,27 and proven to be valid. The zero normal-flux boundary condition is to maintain the conservation law of Si atoms, considering the fact that Si atoms cannot be created or be annihilated at an isolated dislocation.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we believe that these boundary conditions are reasonable approximations. The equilibrium boundary condition for vacancy is equivalent to treating the dislocation as a perfect sink, which have been used in prior works 26,27 and proven to be valid. The zero normal-flux boundary condition is to maintain the conservation law of Si atoms, considering the fact that Si atoms cannot be created or be annihilated at an isolated dislocation.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an increasing number of defects are produced in the surface layer during irradiation, dislocations can be driven by a defects-induced stress field [22]. Figure 3 shows the configuration of dislocation in irradiated samples.…”
Section: Dislocation Configuration In Irradiated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of multiple η-Cu6Sn5 variants (low symmetry) on unidirectional Cu substrates (high symmetry) have been identified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis [37], but the orientation relationship between the η-Cu6Sn5 and Cu substrate and the heteroepitaxial constraint from the substrate have never been connected to the experimentally observed morphological patterns of IMC and incorporated into simulations of Cu-Sn interfacial reactions. To fully account for this effect and characterize the growth of different orientation variants of IMCs on crystalline substrates, it is highly desirable to integrate the available phase-field model of solder system with the microelasticity theory [29] that has been applied successfully to study coherent phase transformations in solids [38][39][40][41], epitaxial/heteroepitaxial film growth [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], dislocation/defect dynamics [50][51][52], as well as phase separation in LiFePO4 nanoparticles [53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%