2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr08850j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-driven magneto-electrical characteristics of single-layer MoS2

Abstract: Magnetism of the MoS2 semiconducting atomic layer was highlighted for its great potential in the applications of spintronics and valleytronics. In this study, we demonstrate an evolution of magneto-electrical properties of single layer MoS2 with the modulation of defect configurations and formation of a partial 1T phase. With Ar treatment, sulfur was depleted within the MoS2 flake leading to a 2H (low-spin) → partial 1T (high-spin) phase transition. The phase transition was accompanied by the development of a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…205 The incorporation of domains of the 1T phase in the 2H matrix induces a robust ferromagnetism in the intrinsically nonmagnetic semiconducting TMDs, further expanding the range of potential applications to spintronic devices. 206,207 The difficulty in accessing the input of the metastable phase is commonly associated with the fact that in many cases, the 1T(1T 0 ) phase co-exists with the thermodynamically stable 2H phase in these produced materials. Here, we review the state-of-the-art research articles related to the understanding of how the intrinsic properties of the 1T(1T 0 ) phases can enable novel applications.…”
Section: How Stable the Metastable 1t(1t 0 ) Phases Are?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…205 The incorporation of domains of the 1T phase in the 2H matrix induces a robust ferromagnetism in the intrinsically nonmagnetic semiconducting TMDs, further expanding the range of potential applications to spintronic devices. 206,207 The difficulty in accessing the input of the metastable phase is commonly associated with the fact that in many cases, the 1T(1T 0 ) phase co-exists with the thermodynamically stable 2H phase in these produced materials. Here, we review the state-of-the-art research articles related to the understanding of how the intrinsic properties of the 1T(1T 0 ) phases can enable novel applications.…”
Section: How Stable the Metastable 1t(1t 0 ) Phases Are?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1d ) 2 , where M is the transition metal element and X is a chalcogen element (S, Se, and Te). These 2D TMDs show rich physical and chemical properties and can be metallic, half-metallic, semiconducting, magnetic, and catalytic, which can be tuned by phase transition, composition engineering, surface functionalization, and external fields (strain and electrical field) 2 9 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 . For example, 2H MoS 2 and WS 2 monolayers are semiconductor, while their 1T phases are metallic 32 33 34 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanadium disulfide monolayer showed better catalytic performance than its selenides and tellurides counterparts 25 and tensile strain can enhance the ability dramatically 26 . The catalytic performance of MX 2 monolayers can be strongly improved by phase transition 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 . For example, the 1T phase MoS 2 and WS 2 nanosheet was proven to be more catalytically active in facilitating hydrogen production in electrolysis of water than their 2H counterpart, although 2H phase is more stable than its 1T phase 30 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peak 2 (2471 eV) at resonance maximum can be attributed, according to previous reports, [63][64][65] to electronic transitions from the S1s core level to unoccupied hybridized S3p-Mo4d electronic states. The pre-edge shoulder at 2468.5 eV (peak 1) can be associated with the presence of S-O bond species [52,60,66]. A third peak, located at 2472.1 eV and attributed to S1s-3p z electronic transitions has been observed for the MoS 2 monolayer sample (black line spectrum in Figure 7) showed here as comparison [63,65].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%