1993
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.48.4702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-difference operator

Abstract: We introduce a unitary operator representing the exponential of the phase difference between two modes of the electromagnetic field. The eigenvalue spectrum has a discrete character that is fully analyzed. We relate this operator with a suitable polar decomposition of the Stokes parameters of the field, obtaining a natural classical limit. The cases of weakly and highly excited states are considered, discussing to what extent it is possible to talk about the phase for a single-mode field. This operator is appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
124
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there exists a complementary property to phase, which is excitation. (More precisely, relative phase, and relative excitation are complementary operators [31,32]). The joint properties with respect to this complementary quantity are not probed by Γ.…”
Section: Joint Phase Properties Of Two Qubitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there exists a complementary property to phase, which is excitation. (More precisely, relative phase, and relative excitation are complementary operators [31,32]). The joint properties with respect to this complementary quantity are not probed by Γ.…”
Section: Joint Phase Properties Of Two Qubitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the n = 0 energy manifold, there is only one associated state, so in this manifold there exist no relative-phasedependent projector. In all other manifolds the eigenstate |ξ (n) (φ) is similar in form to the eigenstates of the relative-phase operator [33]. The projection probabilities in the two arms on the states |ξ (nc) (φ c ) and |ξ (n d ) (φ d ) , respectively, and the joint probability of detecting the relative phases φ c and φ d and the photon numbers n c > 0 and n d > 0 become:…”
Section: Single-photon Nonlocality Based On Relative Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case the phase difference is represented in the quantum domain by the states ͉ ͘ [14]. It can be appreciated that in Eq.…”
Section: Appendix: Two-beam Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The path variable is represented by the operator z , while the phase observable is given by the positive operator measure ͉ ͗͘ ͉ where ͉ ͘ are the phase states [4,13,14],…”
Section: Two-beam Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%