2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase diagrams of a mixed-spin hexagonal Ising nanotube with core-shell structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the effect of the single‐ion anisotropy on the phase diagram is in excellent agreement with the results obtained in ferrimagnetic nanowire with core‐shell morphology [ 31,35 ] and with alternate layers, [ 36 ] where the nanowire is formed by spin‐3/2 and spin‐1. In addition, it is worthwhile to mention that our characteristic results may be qualitatively compared to previous studies on magnetic nanowires, [ 28,37 ] nanotubes, [ 38–40 ] ferromagnetic thin film [ 41 ] and double perovskite Sr2CrIrO6$\left(\text{Sr}\right)_{2} \left(\text{CrIrO}\right)_{6}$. [ 42 ] The results obtained for the critical temperature are in very good agreement with the studies of Salmon et al [ 43 ] and Santos et al, [ 44 ] where the spin‐1 random Blume–Capel model with infinite range interactions was adopted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It should be noted that the effect of the single‐ion anisotropy on the phase diagram is in excellent agreement with the results obtained in ferrimagnetic nanowire with core‐shell morphology [ 31,35 ] and with alternate layers, [ 36 ] where the nanowire is formed by spin‐3/2 and spin‐1. In addition, it is worthwhile to mention that our characteristic results may be qualitatively compared to previous studies on magnetic nanowires, [ 28,37 ] nanotubes, [ 38–40 ] ferromagnetic thin film [ 41 ] and double perovskite Sr2CrIrO6$\left(\text{Sr}\right)_{2} \left(\text{CrIrO}\right)_{6}$. [ 42 ] The results obtained for the critical temperature are in very good agreement with the studies of Salmon et al [ 43 ] and Santos et al, [ 44 ] where the spin‐1 random Blume–Capel model with infinite range interactions was adopted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[41] In contrast, for the theoretical analysis of the qualitative behavior of critical phenomena in molecular magnets configured by the mixing of different spins, mixed Ising models have been efficiently used. [42][43][44] The high-spin Ising models are fundamental to the understanding of the thermomagnetic behavior of magnetic crystal structures. Proof of this can be seen in the research on the magnetic behavior of a graphyne bilayer with (2-5/2) spins, where multiple hysteresis loops and double-temperature-compensation phenomena are analyzed, [45] as well as in the deduction of the thermodynamic properties of a polyhedral chain and hysteresis loops of the hexagonal core-shell nanoparticle described by a mixed spin (3/2-5/2) ferrimagnetic Ising model, by means of MC simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, magnetic nanomaterials have been extensively theoretically investigated using various models and approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. For example, N. Hachem et al [13] used the mean field approximation (MFA) to investigate the effects of exchange couplings and the crystal field on the magnetizations and phase diagrams of a ferrimagnetic mixed-spin (1/2, 3/2) nanotube with a core-shell structure, obtaining first and second-order phase transitions and compensation behaviors.. A. Kadiri et al [15] have also explored the phase diagrams, magnetic susceptibility, and hysteresis loops of ferromagnetic mixed spin-1/2 core and spin-3/2 shell Ising nanoparticles using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). B. Deviren [16] investigated the no equilibrium properties of a kinetic mixed spin (1/2, 1) Ising nanowire system using the Glauber-type stochastic dynamics method, and they presented dynamic phase diagrams with very rich critical behaviors, such as dynamic tricritical point and reentrant phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%