2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1758693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase diagram of the adhesive hard sphere fluid

Abstract: The phase behavior of the Baxter adhesive hard sphere fluid has been determined using specialized Monte Carlo simulations. We give a detailed account of the techniques used and present data for the fluid-fluid coexistence curve as well as parametrized fits for the supercritical equation of state and the percolation threshold. These properties are compared with the existing results of Percus-Yevick theory for this system.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
185
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(65 reference statements)
6
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It leads to different equilibrium states depending on the volume fraction (φ) of the particles and the strength of the interaction energy (u). Weak attraction results in the formation of transient aggregates at low φ and a transient percolating network at high φ, while strong attraction may drive phase separation into a high and a low density liquid [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The strength of the interaction and thus the equilibrium properties are determined by the ratio of the bond formation (α) and the bond breaking (β) probability [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], while the kinetics of such systems depend on the absolute values of α and β.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It leads to different equilibrium states depending on the volume fraction (φ) of the particles and the strength of the interaction energy (u). Weak attraction results in the formation of transient aggregates at low φ and a transient percolating network at high φ, while strong attraction may drive phase separation into a high and a low density liquid [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The strength of the interaction and thus the equilibrium properties are determined by the ratio of the bond formation (α) and the bond breaking (β) probability [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], while the kinetics of such systems depend on the absolute values of α and β.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their criticality criterion for particles with variable range attractions, complemented by the simulation value of the critical temperature obtained in Ref. [40] for the SHS model, yields B 2 /B HS 2 ≈ −1.21.…”
Section: The Noro and Frenkel Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] for the Sticky-Hard-Sphere model, to our effective one-component problem, we are led to conclude that criticality requires B eff 2 /B HS 2 = −1.21 where B eff 2 is the second virial coefficient of our effective solutesolute problem…”
Section: The Noro and Frenkel Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mere visual scrutiny of the simulation snapshots shows that gelation seems to be occurring-note that the attraction is so strong that we are now well beyond the percolation threshold. 12 This refers to a second type of metastability. It is beyond the scope of this paper to investigate this phenomenon further or the possibility of fluid-fluid coexistence.…”
Section: B Consistency Test In the Fluid Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of approximating the original interaction by the Baxter potential is that the fluid phase of the Baxter model has been studied extensively, both theoretically [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and in computer simulations. [10][11][12][13] This means that, once the correspondence between the two systems has been established, all the analytical results of the Baxter model can be fruitfully used for the original system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%