1975
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)91013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase dependent reflex reversal during walking in chronic spinal cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
154
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 586 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
154
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lower extremity intralimb coordination has contributions from both spinal and supraspinal mechanisms (Forssberg et al 1975;Forssberg et al 1980;Hiebert et al 1994). Given the cortical contribution to the latency delays, we postulate that disrupted supraspinal centres are mainly responsible for the longer intralimb coupling duration.…”
Section: Disrupted Timing Of Postural Reflexes Contributes To Fallsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, lower extremity intralimb coordination has contributions from both spinal and supraspinal mechanisms (Forssberg et al 1975;Forssberg et al 1980;Hiebert et al 1994). Given the cortical contribution to the latency delays, we postulate that disrupted supraspinal centres are mainly responsible for the longer intralimb coupling duration.…”
Section: Disrupted Timing Of Postural Reflexes Contributes To Fallsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In cats and lower vertebrates, spinal CPGs are sufficient to produce the basic quadruped locomotor pattern (Grillner and Zangger, 1979;Rossignol et al, 1999) and, by definition, control movement without supraspinal influences or afferent feedback. When sensory information is available, spinal structures alone also provide some degree of flexibility to the basic locomotor pattern (Forssberg et al, 1975, Pearson, 1995. For example, position and load information from the ankle and especially the hip joint strongly influences the timing of the stance-to-swing transition (Grillner and Rossignol, 1978;Duysens and Pearson, 1980).…”
Section: Reactive Feedback Adaptations Do Not Require Cerebellar Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission through cutaneous reflexes is modulated in a phase-dependent manner during the locomotor step cycle in intact cats (Forssberg et al, 1975;Drew and Rossignol, 1987) as well as during fictive stepping in immobilized, decerebrate semichronic (LaBella et al, 1992) and chronic (Forssberg et al, 1975(Forssberg et al, , 1977Andersson et al, 1978) spinal cats. Overall, we found that, when significantly modulated during the fictive step cycle, SPEPSPs and CCS-EPSPs (R1) were of maximal amplitude during flexion in a majority of cases both in flexors/bifunctional (5 of 6) and in extensors (20 of 23), whereas MPL-EPSPs (R1) were of maximal amplitude in extension both in flexors/bifunctional (9 of 9) and in extensors (2 of 4).…”
Section: Effect Of Training During Fictive Locomotor Episodesmentioning
confidence: 99%