1981
DOI: 10.1070/qe1981v011n03abeh006302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase compensation for refractive distortions of partially coherent beams

Abstract: In a one-dimensional shallow optical lattice, in the presence of both cubic and quintic nonlinearity, a superfluid density wave is identified in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Interestingly, it ceases to exist when only one of these interactions is operative. We predict the loss of superfluidity through a classical dynamical phase transition, where modulational instability leads to the loss of phase coherence. In a certain parameter domain, the competition between lattice potential and the interactions is shown t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this case, in eqns (19) and (21) Eqn (18) describing evolution of the mutual coherence function is difficult to analyze because it represents the second order partial differential equation (PDE) for a complex function that depends on two vector (p and R) and two scalar (t and z) variables. The equation (18) can be simplified by considering propagation of a returned wave in a medium with relatively smooth refractive index fluctuations, so that the characteristic scale l (z)for MCF falloff over the difference coordinate (coherence length) p in eqn (18) is smaller than the characteristic spatial scales 4, for refractive index fluctuations -the smooth-refractive-index (SRI) approximation16'9. in this case refractive index fluctuations can be approximated in (18) by the first two terms ofthe Taylor series expansion: n(z,R+p/2)-n(z,R-p/2)n pVRn(z,R).…”
Section: Evolution Of Returned Wave Mutual Coherence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this case, in eqns (19) and (21) Eqn (18) describing evolution of the mutual coherence function is difficult to analyze because it represents the second order partial differential equation (PDE) for a complex function that depends on two vector (p and R) and two scalar (t and z) variables. The equation (18) can be simplified by considering propagation of a returned wave in a medium with relatively smooth refractive index fluctuations, so that the characteristic scale l (z)for MCF falloff over the difference coordinate (coherence length) p in eqn (18) is smaller than the characteristic spatial scales 4, for refractive index fluctuations -the smooth-refractive-index (SRI) approximation16'9. in this case refractive index fluctuations can be approximated in (18) by the first two terms ofthe Taylor series expansion: n(z,R+p/2)-n(z,R-p/2)n pVRn(z,R).…”
Section: Evolution Of Returned Wave Mutual Coherence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation (18) can be simplified by considering propagation of a returned wave in a medium with relatively smooth refractive index fluctuations, so that the characteristic scale l (z)for MCF falloff over the difference coordinate (coherence length) p in eqn (18) is smaller than the characteristic spatial scales 4, for refractive index fluctuations -the smooth-refractive-index (SRI) approximation16'9. in this case refractive index fluctuations can be approximated in (18) by the first two terms ofthe Taylor series expansion: n(z,R+p/2)-n(z,R-p/2)n pVRn(z,R).…”
Section: Evolution Of Returned Wave Mutual Coherence Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for the case of r 0.5 and 1 .0 these differences are not large for the more important region p < ap. 6. We now discuss several qualitative features of the derived formulae and the application to existing x-ray lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%