2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4747707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase coherence and attractor geometry of chaotic electrochemical oscillators

Abstract: Chaotic attractors are known to often exhibit not only complex dynamics but also a complex geometry in phase space. In this work, we provide a detailed characterization of chaotic electrochemical oscillations obtained experimentally as well as numerically from a corresponding mathematical model. Power spectral density and recurrence time distributions reveal a considerable increase of dynamic complexity with increasing temperature of the system, resulting in a larger relative spread of the attractor in phase s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(125 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were made for the network measures L and R (electronic supplementary material, figures S2 and S3). From figure 5, it can be seen that L distinguishes between hyper-chaotic and stochastic dynamics quite well for increasing m. As N is increased, L for the hyper-chaotic system begins to decrease as the spread of the attractor increases in the phase space (hyper-chaos is better characterized geometrically with increasing data length) and this creates shortcuts between distant attractor points [60]. Also, in the case of network measures D T and R (figure 5), the distinction between hyper-chaotic and stochastic dynamics improved with increasing N and m. These results are expected as a higher number of data points leads to a better characterization of the underlying hyper-chaotic dynamics.…”
Section: (B) Global Network Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar observations were made for the network measures L and R (electronic supplementary material, figures S2 and S3). From figure 5, it can be seen that L distinguishes between hyper-chaotic and stochastic dynamics quite well for increasing m. As N is increased, L for the hyper-chaotic system begins to decrease as the spread of the attractor increases in the phase space (hyper-chaos is better characterized geometrically with increasing data length) and this creates shortcuts between distant attractor points [60]. Also, in the case of network measures D T and R (figure 5), the distinction between hyper-chaotic and stochastic dynamics improved with increasing N and m. These results are expected as a higher number of data points leads to a better characterization of the underlying hyper-chaotic dynamics.…”
Section: (B) Global Network Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The chaotic dynamics we consider here are simply the archetypal chaotic R€ ossler system. Differences in results between phase coherent and funnel regime dynamics, for example, 34 may also provide significant results. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Application To Data From Dynamical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recurrence network approaches have been applied to climate data analysis [4,7] , chaotic electro-chemical oscillators [8] , or two-phase flow data [9] . Some basic network motif structures have be identified in music data [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%