1994
DOI: 10.1021/la00022a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Behavior of Polymers with Concentrated Dispersions of Surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 This and other studies on polymer/surfactant systems have shown that the segregative two-phase area increases with increasing polymer MW 35,36 or with increasing size of the surfactant micelle. [34][35][36][37][38] A strong partitioning of the solvent to the polymer-rich phase in a segregating mixture of spherical particles and polymer in a common solvent is expected and is in fact typically observed in aqueous polymer/surfactant and polymer/protein mixtures. 34,39 This effect can be traced to the fact that the osmotic pressure of a flexible polymer solution is larger than that of a solution of compact particles, if the solutes have the same molar mass and the solutions are compared at the same mass concentration of solutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…34 This and other studies on polymer/surfactant systems have shown that the segregative two-phase area increases with increasing polymer MW 35,36 or with increasing size of the surfactant micelle. [34][35][36][37][38] A strong partitioning of the solvent to the polymer-rich phase in a segregating mixture of spherical particles and polymer in a common solvent is expected and is in fact typically observed in aqueous polymer/surfactant and polymer/protein mixtures. 34,39 This effect can be traced to the fact that the osmotic pressure of a flexible polymer solution is larger than that of a solution of compact particles, if the solutes have the same molar mass and the solutions are compared at the same mass concentration of solutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the extent of depression of CP is 4-5°C in case of HEC, while HMHEC lowers the CP to about 20°C for TX-114 and 50°C for TX-100 at low concentration of both the surfactants. This may be due to the absence of strong molecular interaction exerted by HEC with surfactant except for the excluded volume effect [153,154], thereby leading to a depletion flocculation for the micelles and a segregative phase separation [155]. Conversely, added HMHEC provides sufficient hydrophobic interaction with surfactant molecules resulting in the formation of mixed micelles [156][157][158][159][160].…”
Section: Effect Of Organic Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Our analytic PRISM theory is applicable to all size ratios of the particle to the polymer R g , and can probe situations of arbitrarily high size asymmetry which are difficult or impossible to study presently via either numerical PRISM theory or simulations. Cases in which the particle radius R exceeds the coil size R g are relevant to the interactions of polymers with colloidal particles, for which typically 1-16 RϷ50-500 nm; on the other hand, the interaction of polymers with globular protein molecules 17 or spherical surfactant micelles 48 for which RϷ10Ϫ20 Å often corresponds to RӶR g . We refer to calculations in the regimes RӷR g and RӶR g as ''colloidlike'' and ''proteinlike'' cases, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%