2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase behavior of mixed solution of a glycerin-modified cationic surfactant and an anionic surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In equations (2) and (3) region followed by decrease in magnitude when concentration exceeds equimolarity which can be attributed to the steric hindrance offered by more TC molecules as earlier reported in many catanionic mixtures [36][37][38][39][40]. But at αTC = 0.9 in case of TC + SDBS, the highest β m value were found to be present when which might be due to the reason that more TC molecules orient the bulkier headgroups of SDBS molecules in such a array that they release the TC molecules and reduces repulsive interactions there.…”
Section: Micellar Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In equations (2) and (3) region followed by decrease in magnitude when concentration exceeds equimolarity which can be attributed to the steric hindrance offered by more TC molecules as earlier reported in many catanionic mixtures [36][37][38][39][40]. But at αTC = 0.9 in case of TC + SDBS, the highest β m value were found to be present when which might be due to the reason that more TC molecules orient the bulkier headgroups of SDBS molecules in such a array that they release the TC molecules and reduces repulsive interactions there.…”
Section: Micellar Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We expect that the glycerin unit covalently bound to the amine or quaternary ammonium headgroup results in increased water solubility compared with glycerin-unmodified compounds, such as N,N-dimethylhexadecylamine or hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride and hence allows highly hydrophilic stoichiometric complex systems to form, which do not precipitate even at an equivalent molar mixing with alkyl dicarboxylic acid. This expectation is supported by the experimental results in which the glycerin-modifi ed cationic surfactant C16Q narrows the precipitation region in its three-phase diagram with an anionic surfactant and water and the catanionic surfactants form vesicular assemblies which are well-dispersed in aqueous media 15 . The alkyl dicarboxylic acid compounds reported herein were bola-type, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purifi cation. The cationic surfactant C16Q was synthesized according to the procedure mentioned in our previous paper 15 . The water used in this study was deionized with a Barnstead NANO Pure Diamond UV system and fi ltered with a Millipore membrane fi lter 0.22 m pore size .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inflection on the isotherms in the region of small coverage of the sorbents (Fig. 2a,b) is probably connected with some prevalence of the equimolar composition of the adsorbed layer and with change in its structure as a result of the formation of different aggregates, characteristic of interaction of anionic and cationic surfactants [8]. The sharp growth of the adsorption values (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2, a and b the following should be noted. The behavior of the aqueous solutions of the binary mixture SDS/CPB, in particular the general shapes of the curves and the large negative value of b for equimolar mixtures (a = 0.5) are explained by the strong electrostatic attraction of the oppositely charged surfactant ions and the catanionic surfactants formed (CPDS -cetylpyridinium dodecylsulfate) [7,8]. However the excess interaction between the surfactants in the mixed aggregates in comparison with interactions of surfactants of one type in individual micelles is characteristic for other corresponding components in the system (b < 0, see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%