The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-013-9725-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Appearance or Disappearance in Two-Phase Flows

Abstract: 29.04.15 KB. Ok to add accepted version to spiral, embargo expire

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also known that this system displays lack of positivity and instabilities due to phase appearance/disappearance process [11,51]. In addition, the effect of algebraic source terms represents a system of "stiff" differential equations [15] and roundoff errors may significantly contribute to numerical instabilities.…”
Section: A Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that this system displays lack of positivity and instabilities due to phase appearance/disappearance process [11,51]. In addition, the effect of algebraic source terms represents a system of "stiff" differential equations [15] and roundoff errors may significantly contribute to numerical instabilities.…”
Section: A Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this model is known to be non-hyperbolic [9,24], to display lack of positivity [11] and instabilities due to phase appearance and disappearance [7,11]. In addition, this model represents a system of "stiff" differential equations [9].…”
Section: Separated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent progress [5,6,7,8] the state of the art in two-phase modeling exhibits a lack of general agreement regarding the fundamental physical models that describe the complex phenomena [8] and a wide diversity of algorithms [5,6,7,9] developed for integration of these models. One of the major problems (see, however, recent claims [8]) is a large number of instabilities inherent to these solvers [7,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paillére et al [29] describe an extension of the AUSM+scheme and propose to handle the velocity of the vanishing phase in a different way, if compared to [11]: they do not set the velocity arbitrarily to zero, but they make the vanishing phase velocity tend to the velocity of the remaining phase, thanks to a smoothing function. Cordier et al [30] analyze the hyperbolicity of the two-fluid model and the loss of positivity of the numerical scheme in the presence of a vanishing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned transition criteria were developed for the four-equation two-fluid model [11,25,27,29], the five-equation two-fluid model [28], the six-equation two-fluid model [30] and the multi-field model [26]; as far as we know, no transition method has been developed for the case of a simplified two-fluid model, and thus, we develop here, for the first time, a completely new criterion for the two-equation model, on the basis of the previous literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%