2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase angle predicts physical function in older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
34
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cunha et al [22] observed an increased phase angle (5.87-6.12° and 5.50-5.90°, respectively, p<0.05) and improved muscle mass quality, following 12-week resistance training in elderly women who underwent resistance training compared with elderly women who did not receive this training. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202235200243 Although we did not observe an association between the phase angle and muscle strength and physical performance in our study, other studies have reported a correlation between the phase angle and these aforementioned parameters of sarcopenia [5,9,16,[23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Cunha et al [22] observed an increased phase angle (5.87-6.12° and 5.50-5.90°, respectively, p<0.05) and improved muscle mass quality, following 12-week resistance training in elderly women who underwent resistance training compared with elderly women who did not receive this training. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202235200243 Although we did not observe an association between the phase angle and muscle strength and physical performance in our study, other studies have reported a correlation between the phase angle and these aforementioned parameters of sarcopenia [5,9,16,[23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The differences observed may reflect variations in muscle strength and in the quantity of the muscle mass of the different participants [ 62 ], but it may also reflect differences in methodological level with the use of different devices to assess PhA [ 70 ]. Actually, in a study of healthy individuals from the same country, which may eventually correspond to identical aging in terms of lifestyle, Matias et al found similar values of 5.29° ± 0.54° in 92 female participants [ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that PhA was associated with muscle strength [44] and quadriceps strength [40]. Therefore, there is a possibility that PhA might be a useful predictor for screening physical function [45]. In this study, preoperative PhA correlated with postoperative HU of both the gluteus maximus and quadriceps, and muscle volume of the quadriceps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%