2000
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.2.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment

Abstract: Despite the favorable effects of HAART on the nutritional status of HIV-infected persons, low phase angle remains an independent adverse prognostic marker of clinical progression and survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
177
2
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
177
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Among HIV-infected individuals, the phase angle has been inversely related to the risk of death (Ott et al, 1995;Schwenk et al, 2000), although a precise mechanism is not known yet. In this study, the average phase angle in both HIV-positive and -negative subjects was lower than the means reported among healthy adults (Ellis, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among HIV-infected individuals, the phase angle has been inversely related to the risk of death (Ott et al, 1995;Schwenk et al, 2000), although a precise mechanism is not known yet. In this study, the average phase angle in both HIV-positive and -negative subjects was lower than the means reported among healthy adults (Ellis, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few cross-sectional studies examined the impact of HIV infection on body composition of adults with TB and yielded divergent results; BCM was found to be lower in coinfected men from Malawi (Van Lettow et al, 2004), but not in patients from Uganda (Shah et al, 2001) or Burundi (Niyongabo et al, 1994(Niyongabo et al, , 1999. In Malawi and Uganda, HIV coinfection was related to decreased phase angle, an indicator of cell membrane integrity that has been reported to be predictive of mortality (Ott et al, 1995;Schwenk et al, 2000). One of the reasons that could explain differences in the results across studies is that they did not take into account the influence of confounding factors that affect body composition and which may also be associated with HIV infection in persons with TB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,30 The phase angle, one of the raw data obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements and therefore independent from the equipment and internal algorithms used, has proved to be a good prognostic, nutritional and membrane cell function marker in various diseases. 18,21,31,32 Sex-, age-and BMI-specific reference values of the phase angle from a large healthy German population 33 34 The transformation of phase angle values into standardized values (Z-score) allows us to quantify individual deviations from sex-, age-and BMI-specific population averages and to compare subjects from a heterogeneous group. Furthermore, Norman et al 16 showed that this standardization clearly enhances the phase angle's predictive power.…”
Section: Study Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its use has been recommended as an indicator of prognosis in clinical practice. In adults, positive associations have been found between PA and survival of HIV-positive patients,6 , 7 and those with pulmonary cancer,8 as well as sepsis and those undergoing hemodialysis 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%