2023
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0084oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2–5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ivacaftor and its combination CFTR modulator were generally well tolerated and had similar safety profiles in phase 3 studies involving younger age groups (Table 2). Compared with placebo, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor had a similar incidence of adverse events (93.1% vs 96.1%) including headache (17%), upper respiratory tract infection (16%), abdominal pain (14%), diarrhea (13%), exanthem (10%), increased alanine transaminase (10%), or aspartate transaminase (9%) . Serious adverse events were less common in the treatment group (13.9% vs 20.9%) .…”
Section: Discussion and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ivacaftor and its combination CFTR modulator were generally well tolerated and had similar safety profiles in phase 3 studies involving younger age groups (Table 2). Compared with placebo, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor had a similar incidence of adverse events (93.1% vs 96.1%) including headache (17%), upper respiratory tract infection (16%), abdominal pain (14%), diarrhea (13%), exanthem (10%), increased alanine transaminase (10%), or aspartate transaminase (9%) . Serious adverse events were less common in the treatment group (13.9% vs 20.9%) .…”
Section: Discussion and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is approved for patients aged 2 years or older; approximately 90% of people with cystic fibrosis, including for those with variants that have demonstrated in vitro culture response to treatment . This technique known as theratyping has increased access to therapy with modulator drugs among people with rare (<1%) CFTR variants …”
Section: Discussion and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two clinical trials documented the safety and efficacy of ETI in children ≥6 years with at least one F508del mutation ( Zemanick et al, 2021 ; Mall et al, 2022 ). More recently, the results of the phase 3 open label trial including children aged 2–5 years taking ETI therapy were published ( Goralski et al, 2023 ), demonstrating a significant improvement in LCI 25 as well as reduced sweat chloride concentrations after 24 weeks of treatment. Outside clinical studies, compliance regarding the reliable drug intake is less closely monitored and as such more likely to be variable than under study conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive changes in BMI z‐scores from baseline were also noted after 24 weeks (Δ 0.29) 68 and 96 weeks (Δ 0.27) 69 of lumacaftor/ivacaftor in children 2–5 years, whereas, in toddlers aged 1 to ≤ 2 years on lumacaftor/ivacaftor for 24 weeks, BMI z ‐score was maintained compared to baseline (Δ 0.04) 70 . ETI has led to significant gains in weight and BMI in the tested populations of patients, 71,72 including children aged 6–11 years in whom BMI z ‐score increased on average by 0.37 after 24 weeks of therapy 73 whereas, in younger children (2–5 years) on ETI for 24 weeks, BMI z ‐score remained stable (Δ 0.10) 74 . Consistent with results from ivacaftor studies, initiation of dual therapies or ETI in toddlers, 70 preschoolers 68,69,75 and older children 67,73,74,76–78 led to minimal changes in height z ‐scores from baseline values, which, on average, were close to normal for age.…”
Section: From Early Life To Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ETI has led to significant gains in weight and BMI in the tested populations of patients, 71,72 including children aged 6–11 years in whom BMI z ‐score increased on average by 0.37 after 24 weeks of therapy 73 whereas, in younger children (2–5 years) on ETI for 24 weeks, BMI z ‐score remained stable (Δ 0.10) 74 . Consistent with results from ivacaftor studies, initiation of dual therapies or ETI in toddlers, 70 preschoolers 68,69,75 and older children 67,73,74,76–78 led to minimal changes in height z ‐scores from baseline values, which, on average, were close to normal for age. These findings suggest that the use of modulators does not noticeably impact linear growth, which maintains its age‐appropriate trajectory.…”
Section: From Early Life To Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%