2006
DOI: 10.1086/509259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase 1 Safety and Immunogenicity Evaluation of a Multiclade HIV‐1 DNA Candidate Vaccine

Abstract: DNA vaccination induced antibody to and T cell responses against 3 major HIV-1 subtypes and will be further evaluated as a potential component of a preventive AIDS vaccine regimen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
190
5
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
16
190
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, recent progress with gene-based vaccination approaches, which have used either DNA or viral vectors as delivery systems, have been effective in eliciting cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses in early phase human studies. However, these studies either did not put forth an effort to elicit protective antibody responses [12,13] or were not effective, when used alone, in eliciting neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against even relatively sensitive viral isolates [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, recent progress with gene-based vaccination approaches, which have used either DNA or viral vectors as delivery systems, have been effective in eliciting cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses in early phase human studies. However, these studies either did not put forth an effort to elicit protective antibody responses [12,13] or were not effective, when used alone, in eliciting neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against even relatively sensitive viral isolates [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preclinical testing of DP6-001 demonstrated no significant adverse reactions in either rabbits or non-human primates despite the induction of robust immunity [2,3]. Previously tested HIV DNA vaccines have demonstrated excellent human safety profiles [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recombinant protein-based HIV vaccines formulated with QS21 adjuvant have reported local reactions, but have shown limited systemic adverse events in humans [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Hiv; Vaccine; Adverse Event; Vasculitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HIV vaccine was included in this study to evaluate its immunogenicity and to interrogate possible interference of the two types of CE DNA vaccine regimens, since we and others previously reported potent inhibition of Gag T cell responses by FL Env vaccines. 7881 The 31 Indian rhesus macaques enrolled in this study are described in Table 1. Two groups of animals received the same CE DNA vaccine but differed in the delivery routes (Figure 1B), intramuscular (IM) followed by electroporation (EP) using CELLECTRA® 5P (CE IM group) versus intradermal (ID) followed by EP using CELLECTRA®3P (CE ID group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the potential interference between Env and Gag epitopes that has been reported previously in mice, macaques and humans, 7881 , 87 macaques immunized with the SIV Gag CE and FL gag DNA also received the HIV Env CE and FL env DNA vaccine. Importantly, and in contrast to previous observations using only full-length immunogens, we did not find any interference or negative effects from the Env CE DNA immunogen on the cellular responses targeting Gag CE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%