2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2005.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharyngo-cervical Esophageal Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
25
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no complications with tubed RFFF, prolonged transit time is associated with a lack of motility and diminished lubrication of the wall in the neopharynx. 2 This supports our suggestion to use the remnant pharyngeal wall, regardless of size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although there are no complications with tubed RFFF, prolonged transit time is associated with a lack of motility and diminished lubrication of the wall in the neopharynx. 2 This supports our suggestion to use the remnant pharyngeal wall, regardless of size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Pedicled colonic interposition or jejunal transfer is an alternative method that can be used when the gastric tube pull-up procedure is not applicable. 1,12 However, conduit ischemia and necrosis in the distal segment are high and carry the possibility of serious complications including mediastinitis and pneumonia. 8,13 In such situations, microvascular circulation enhancement, otherwise known as the supercharge technique, can increase blood circulation to the interposed conduit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Reconstruction of the esophagus is commonly achieved by a jejunal or fasciocutaneous free conduit transfer. Successful restoration of the digestive tract continuity along with anterior neck coverage is therefore critically important functionally and psychologically yet invariably challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%