2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharyngeal dimensional changes in class II malocclusion treatment when using Forsus® or intermaxillary elastics – An exploratory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No randomized controlled trials could be identified. Except for one unknown [ 29 ] and two multi-center studies [ 26 , 40 ], all included studies were single-center based. Eight studies had a prospective and 40 a retrospective study design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No randomized controlled trials could be identified. Except for one unknown [ 29 ] and two multi-center studies [ 26 , 40 ], all included studies were single-center based. Eight studies had a prospective and 40 a retrospective study design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results for fixed appliances therapy with extraction were less consistent, with both increase and decrease of volumes in the airway being reported, though the change was significant only in one study ( p < 0.05) [ 60 ]. This inconsistency can be related to the age of the study subjects, as a decrease in the volume of the airway was observed only in adult patients[ 26 , 55 , 58 , 60 ] while an increase was observed mostly in growing adolescents [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar results, za-Bussolaro et al (28) conducted a retrospective exploratory cohort study to determine the extent to which class II malocclusion treatment with either intermaxillary elastics (IME) or the Forsus fatigue resistance device (FFRD) results in a change in oropharyngeal airway dimensions. The results demonstrated that the oropharyngeal airway increased in size in a comparable way with both orthodontic treatment regimens.…”
Section: Table (3) Total Airway Space In Pre-and Post-distalization D...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, they mentioned that analyses based on two-dimensional cephalometric measurements as the sole indicators had some shortcomings, which may have affected the results. Moreover, upper airway is closely related to the craniomaxillofacial structure [ 7 , 8 ]. But to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have described changes in pharyngeal size after treating Angle class III malocclusions with Frankel III appliance in children that are growing and developing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%