Pharmacovigilance 2006
DOI: 10.1002/9780470059210.ch31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding “company reports,” grade 2 was the most frequent, followed by grade 0. “Company reports” in the JADER, which were based on various sources, including spontaneous reports from medical institutions, early postmarketing phase surveillance, research, literature reports, conference presentation, Internet, and so forth, were likely to have differences in quality . In some cases, it would be difficult for pharmaceutical companies to obtain more detailed information regarding ADR cases from information sources that could not be untraceable, although detailed information regarding the sources of ADR reports was undisclosed in the JADER.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding “company reports,” grade 2 was the most frequent, followed by grade 0. “Company reports” in the JADER, which were based on various sources, including spontaneous reports from medical institutions, early postmarketing phase surveillance, research, literature reports, conference presentation, Internet, and so forth, were likely to have differences in quality . In some cases, it would be difficult for pharmaceutical companies to obtain more detailed information regarding ADR cases from information sources that could not be untraceable, although detailed information regarding the sources of ADR reports was undisclosed in the JADER.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%