2015
DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.irjns.1.2.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacotherapy to Improve the Acquired Aphasia following Brain Damages: A Review Study

Abstract: Background & Aim: Using pharmaceutical agents in treatment of aphasia has caught the attention of many neurologists and neuroscientists. This short review study has sought the role of pharmacotherapy in treatment of aphasia, a linguistic impairment after acquired brain lesions. The pharmacological principles and mechanisms related to the effects of drugs used in aphasia rehabilitation are pointed. Then, some evidence of clinical trials on different drugs in this field is presented. Methods & Materials/Patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to numerous lines of research into augmenting the effectiveness and efficiency of SLT hours, notably via neurostimulation [7][8][9][10][11] or pharmacological adjuncts [12,13]. Enthusiasm among clinicians and patients alike for a "magic pill" to reverse ischemic brain injury's effects has been reflected in reviews on the topic of pharmacology in aphasia [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], recently emerging at the rate of about one per year. Notably, the rate of reviews well exceeds that of clinical trials, positive or otherwise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to numerous lines of research into augmenting the effectiveness and efficiency of SLT hours, notably via neurostimulation [7][8][9][10][11] or pharmacological adjuncts [12,13]. Enthusiasm among clinicians and patients alike for a "magic pill" to reverse ischemic brain injury's effects has been reflected in reviews on the topic of pharmacology in aphasia [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], recently emerging at the rate of about one per year. Notably, the rate of reviews well exceeds that of clinical trials, positive or otherwise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%