1975
DOI: 10.1136/gut.16.4.307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacology of colonic muscle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, studies using human tissue in vitro have failed to demonstrate any evidence of such a spasmogenic effect of morphine (Bennett, 1975;Burleigh, 1983;Burleigh et al, 1984). This apparent lack of effect may be due to several factors: (a) morphine may not act directly on colonic smooth muscle cells, (b) the unpredictable and changing spontaneous motility of human taenia muscle strips (Bucknell & Whitney, 1966) or a complex response to electrical field stimulation ofintrinsic nerves (Stockley & Bennett, 1974) may obscure an effect ofmorphine on responses to stimulation ofintrinsic cholinergic nerves, (c) all human tissue has been obtained from major bowel resections and the opioid drugs administered before or during the operation may prevent responses to subsequent exposure of the tissue to morphine, (d) there is evidence that the gastrointestinal effects of morphine may partly result from actions on the central nervous system (Parolaro et al, 1977;Stewart et al, 1978;Burleigh et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, studies using human tissue in vitro have failed to demonstrate any evidence of such a spasmogenic effect of morphine (Bennett, 1975;Burleigh, 1983;Burleigh et al, 1984). This apparent lack of effect may be due to several factors: (a) morphine may not act directly on colonic smooth muscle cells, (b) the unpredictable and changing spontaneous motility of human taenia muscle strips (Bucknell & Whitney, 1966) or a complex response to electrical field stimulation ofintrinsic nerves (Stockley & Bennett, 1974) may obscure an effect ofmorphine on responses to stimulation ofintrinsic cholinergic nerves, (c) all human tissue has been obtained from major bowel resections and the opioid drugs administered before or during the operation may prevent responses to subsequent exposure of the tissue to morphine, (d) there is evidence that the gastrointestinal effects of morphine may partly result from actions on the central nervous system (Parolaro et al, 1977;Stewart et al, 1978;Burleigh et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the findings of Hecker and co-workers (22,53), hemin alone produced a statistically significant increase above buffer (p ϭ 0.012), but the same heme concentration of human liver microsomes produced 15-fold more HHT. Other heme proteins, namely cytochrome b 5 , catalase, and hemoglobin did not convert PGH 2 to HHT beyond what was observed with an equivalent concentration of hemin alone (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Conversion Of Pgh 2 To Hht By Human Liver Microsomes-mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We are investigating the possibility that COX-2 expression leads to increased DNA damage and mutation. The likely mediator of DNA damage is malondialdehyde (MDA), a product of the breakdown of PGH 2 (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How ever, the system becomes less efficient and the spontaneous activity develops and in creases progressively. The role of a sympa thetic inhibitory system in the colon of var ious species has been discussed by Stockley and Bennett [1974] and Bennett [1975], Moreover, based on the analysis of the re sponses of the rat-isolated terminal colon to opiates, Gilland and Pollock [ 1980] suggested that the rat colon 'receives in addition to a motor cholinergic and perhaps an indirect inhibitory adrenergic innervation, a nonadrenergic, non-cholinergic inhibitory inner vation'. Such a complex situation might ex plain why atropine, methysergide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%