Pharmacology Education in North American Dental Schools: The Basic Science Survey Series

Abstract

As part of the Basic Science Survey Series (BSSS) for Dentistry, members of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) Physiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics Section surveyed course directors of basic pharmacology courses in North American dental schools. The survey was designed to assess, among other things, faculty afiliation and experience of course directors, teaching methods, general course content and emphasis, extent of interdisciplinary (shared) instruction, and impact of recent curricular changes. Responses were received from forty-nine of sixty-seven (73.1 percent) U.S. and Canadian dental schools. The indings suggest the following: 1) substantial variation exists in instructional hours, faculty afiliation, placement within curriculum, class size, and interdisciplinary nature of pharmacology courses; 2) pharmacology course content emphasis is similar among schools; 3) the number of contact hours in pharmacology has remained stable over the past three decades; 4) recent curricular changes were often directed towards enhancing the integrative and clinically relevant aspects of pharmacology instruction; and 5) a trend toward innovative content delivery, such as use of computer-assisted instruction applications, is evident. Data, derived from this study, may be useful to pharmacology course directors, curriculum committees, and other dental educators with an interest in integrative and interprofessional education. Dr. Gautam is Associate Professor and Section Head

Attitudes toward drug prescription rights: a survey of Ontario chiropractors

“…A possible explanation is that over 72 % of respondents in the current study graduated from the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College where students presently receive 30 h of training in pharmacology and toxicology [ 25 ]. Although this number of hours in pharmacology education is above the World Health Organization standards for chiropractic, students in other healthcare professions such as dentistry complete an average of almost 70 h [ 26 ] and chiropractic students in Switzerland take over 80 h in pharmacology at the University of Zürich (C.K. Peterson, personal communication, 18 January 2015).…”

Assessing Students’ Satisfaction with a Redesigned Pharmacology Course Series

“…Although it is widely established that the implementation of active-teaching modalities increases students' satisfaction, most foundational courses such as pharmacology remain lecture-based. 7,24,25 The development of such active-teaching sessions is a timeconsuming task not easily achieved by faculty members who have many other important clinical and/or research responsibilities and clinical activities generally take priority over faculty member teaching obligations. 26 Investing significant resources to hire a professional pharmacology educator allows a school to bypass this challenge and further justify the investment.…”

“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] One strategy in these curricular modifications is to emphasize the importance of pharmacology as an integrative science. [5][6][7][8]11 Schools have shifted away from teaching pharmacology, physiology, and therapeutics in silos and toward teaching interdisciplinary curricula that emphasizes the interrelatedness of basic and clinical principles. One study reported high student satisfaction when an interdisciplinary approach was used to teach pharmacology topics in combination with physiology topics in the neurosciences.…”

Recall of Theoretical Pharmacology Knowledge by 6th Year Medical Students and Interns of Three Medical Schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

“…The survey was designed to assess the effect of recent curricular changes between system-based learning and others. Course directors reported that curricular changes affect their pharmacology lecturers [13].…”