Abstract:The role of serotonin 5-HT 2 receptors (5-HT 2 R) in the hyperactivity induced by ( ϩ )-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (( ϩ )-MDMA; 3 mg/kg) was investigated. Hyperactivity induced by ( ϩ )-MDMA was robustly potentiated by the 5-HT 2B/2C R antagonist SB 206553 (1.0, 2.0, and 4.0
mg/kg). Administration of the 5-HT 1B/1D R antagonist GR 127935 (2.5 mg/kg) or the 5-HT 2A R antagonist M100907 (1.0 mg/kg) partially suppressed the potentiated hyperactivity seen following SB 206553 plus ( ϩ )-MDMA; a blockade t… Show more
“…Consistent with previous reports (Geyer et al 1987), we observed that animals spent more time (>40%) in central than peripheral regions of the chamber following administration of 2 mg/kg (+)-amphetamine. By contrast, several studies from different laboratories have reported observing more peripheral than central activity following (+)-MDMA administration (McCreary et al 1999;Bankson and Cunningham 2002;Gold et al 1988;Callaway et al 1990). In the present experiments, however, locomotor activity was nearly evenly distributed between the central and peripheral areas of the chamber following administration of 5 mg/kg (±)-MDMA.…”
The recreational drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) increases locomotor activity when administered to rats. Although the published pharmacology of MDMA has focused almost exclusively on the roles of serotonin and dopamine, in vitro studies indicate that MDMA induces serotonin and norepinephrine release with equal potency. The present experiments tested the hypothesis that blockade of α 1 -adrenoceptors with systemic or local administration of the antagonist prazosin would attenuate the locomotor response to systemic administration of (±)-MDMA. Pretreatment with systemic prazosin (0.5 mg/kg) or microinjections into either the prefrontal cortex or ventral tegmental area completely blocked the locomotor stimulant effects of 5 mg/kg (±)-MDMA, assessed using a computerized Behavioral Pattern Monitor. Prazosin was more potent in blocking the locomotor stimulant effects of (±)-MDMA than a 2 mg/kg dose of (+)-amphetamine that produced a similar locomotor activity increase. These results indicate that activation of α 1 -adrenoceptors in both the prefrontal cortex and ventral tegmental areas modulate the locomotor response to MDMA.
“…Consistent with previous reports (Geyer et al 1987), we observed that animals spent more time (>40%) in central than peripheral regions of the chamber following administration of 2 mg/kg (+)-amphetamine. By contrast, several studies from different laboratories have reported observing more peripheral than central activity following (+)-MDMA administration (McCreary et al 1999;Bankson and Cunningham 2002;Gold et al 1988;Callaway et al 1990). In the present experiments, however, locomotor activity was nearly evenly distributed between the central and peripheral areas of the chamber following administration of 5 mg/kg (±)-MDMA.…”
The recreational drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) increases locomotor activity when administered to rats. Although the published pharmacology of MDMA has focused almost exclusively on the roles of serotonin and dopamine, in vitro studies indicate that MDMA induces serotonin and norepinephrine release with equal potency. The present experiments tested the hypothesis that blockade of α 1 -adrenoceptors with systemic or local administration of the antagonist prazosin would attenuate the locomotor response to systemic administration of (±)-MDMA. Pretreatment with systemic prazosin (0.5 mg/kg) or microinjections into either the prefrontal cortex or ventral tegmental area completely blocked the locomotor stimulant effects of 5 mg/kg (±)-MDMA, assessed using a computerized Behavioral Pattern Monitor. Prazosin was more potent in blocking the locomotor stimulant effects of (±)-MDMA than a 2 mg/kg dose of (+)-amphetamine that produced a similar locomotor activity increase. These results indicate that activation of α 1 -adrenoceptors in both the prefrontal cortex and ventral tegmental areas modulate the locomotor response to MDMA.
“…MDMA releases dopamine both directly and indirectly through 5-HT release (Callaway et al 1990;Koch and Galloway 1997;Schmidt et al 1992;Yamamoto and Spanos 1988). Both 5-HT 1B and 5-HT 2 receptors can influence the MDMA locomotor response, although both stimulatory and inhibitory effects have been reported (Bankson and Cunningham 2002;Kehne et al 1996;McCreary et al 1999;Schmidt et al 1992). Estrogen enhances basal, stimulated, and stimulant-induced dopamine release as well as both dopamine and serotonin receptors (see reviews by Becker 1999;Cyr et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple mechanisms could contribute to this enhanced response including greater changes in dopamine signaling, upregulation of serotonin receptors like that occurring after other manipulations that deplete serotonin, or some adaptation that is specific for MDMA (Dringenberg et al 1995;Gately et al 1985;Nestler 2004). The augmented response in females could reflect a sex-specific receptor upregulation facilitated by estrogen-facilitated 5-HT 2 receptor synthesis (Bankson and Cunningham 2002;Cyr et al 2002;Reneman et al 2000).…”
Rationale 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; "Ecstasy") use has been associated with acute toxicities and persistent depletion of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT). Objectives This study investigates whether sex differences in the acute and long-term effects of MDMA exist. Methods Male and female rats received saline or 15 mg/kg MDMA, ip, bid for 4 days. Temperature was monitored on days 1 and 4. Locomotor activity was measured in a second cohort of animals on days 1 and 4 and after recovery on day 14. The effects of MDMA on performance in a plus maze task and brain levels of serotonin (5-HT) and the serotonin metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) were determined in a third cohort of animals 2 weeks after the last MDMA treatment. Results Locomotor activity and temperature increased after MDMA administration on day 1. The drug-induced increases in temperature but not locomotion attenuated with repeated MDMA administration. Male and female MDMA-treated rats spent less time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze and had less 5-HT and 5-HIAA in all brain regions 2 weeks after the end of treatment. Temperature effects of MDMA and persistent effects on plus maze and brain serotonin content were similar in males and females. In contrast, females exhibited markedly greater locomotor stimulation after acute MDMA and also showed sensitization to an acute challenge 2 weeks later. Conclusions MDMA elicits substantially greater locomotor activation in female rats than in males, but persistent effects on anxiety and serotonin content were similar in males and females.
“…Likewise, several studies have excluded the possibility that nonspecific behavioral changes, such as hyperlocomotion and even sedation, may account for the hypophagic responses to 5-HT 1B , 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2B , or 5-HT 2C receptor agonists ( Kitchener and Dourish, 1994; Lee and Simansky, 1997;Hewitt et al, 2002;Clifton et al, 2000Clifton et al, , 2003. The fact that 5-HT 2C receptors may contribute to MDMA-induced hyperlocomotion has been questioned in one study using rats (Bankson and Cunningham, 2002). This investigation reported that SB206553, a 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist, enhanced the motor effects of MDMA in the rat (Bankson and Cunningham, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that 5-HT 2C receptors may contribute to MDMA-induced hyperlocomotion has been questioned in one study using rats (Bankson and Cunningham, 2002). This investigation reported that SB206553, a 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist, enhanced the motor effects of MDMA in the rat (Bankson and Cunningham, 2002). Such a discrepancy may likely be due to dose-or species-specific differences since an acute administration of 3.3 mg/kg MDMA did not stimulate locomotion in mice (Scearce-Levie et al, 1999), but did in rats ( Bankson and Cunningham, 2002).…”
3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine (MDMA or 'ecstasy') is a psychoactive substance, first described as an appetite suppressant in humans, inducing side effects and even death. MDMA increases serotonin (5-HT) levels, and 5-HT inhibits food intake, but the 5-HT receptors involved in MDMA-induced changes in feeding behavior are unknown. We examined whether a systemic MDMA injection would reduce the physiological drive to eat in starved mice and tested if the inactivation of 5-HT 1B or 5-HT 2C receptors could restore this response. Our results indicate that in starved mice, MDMA (10 mg/kg) provoked an initial hypophagia for 1 h (À77%) followed by a period of hyperphagia (studied between 1 and 3 h). This biphasic feeding behavior due to MDMA treatment was maintained in 5-HT 1B receptornull mice or in animals treated with the 5-HT 1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935 (3 or 10 mg/kg). In contrast, MDMA-induced hypophagia (for the first 1 h period) was suppressed when combined with the 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist RS102221 (2 mg/kg). However, RS102221 did not alter MDMA-induced hyperphagia (for the 1-3 h period) but did exert a stimulant effect, when administered alone, during that period. We have previously shown that MDMA or 5-HT 1A/1B receptor agonist RU24969 fails to stimulate locomotor activity in 5-HT 1B receptor-null mice. Our present data indicate that the 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist RS102221 suppresses MDMA-induced hyperlocomotion. These findings provide the first evidence that the inactivation of 5-HT 2C receptors may reduce hypophagia and motor response to MDMA, while a genetic deficit or pharmacological inactivation of 5-HT 1B receptors was insufficient to alter the feeding response to MDMA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.