Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1254/jjp.75.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Profiles of a Novel Non-peptide Angiotensin II Type I Receptor Antagonist HR720 In Vitro and In Vivo

Abstract: ABSTRACT-The pharmacological properties of 2-butyl-4-(methylthio)-1- [[2 [[[(propylamino)carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl](1,1 biphenyl)-4-yl]methyl]-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (HR720), a novel non-peptide angiotensin (Ang) II type I (AT1) receptor antagonist, were characterized in both in vitro and in vivo systems. In vitro autoradiography using 125I-[Sar1,IIe8]Ang II as a ligand revealed that HR720 competitively inhibited the specific binding of the ligand to the adrenal cortex. The IC50 value for the adrenal cort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of these studies, the various ARBs appear to have the following affinity estimates (pK i or pIC 50 ; median with 95% confidence intervals) at mammalian AT1R: azilsartan (8.51; 4.71-10.94; n = 3), candesartan (8.43; 8.01-8.80; n = 26), eprosartan (8.26; 8.02-8.58; n = 12), irbesartan (8.72; 8.42-8.87; n = 14), losartan (7.71; 7.50-7.73; n = 63), EXP3174 (8.17;; n = 21), olmesartan (8.17; 7.99-8.60; n = 5), telmisartan (8.33; 8.12-8.53; n = 14), and valsartan (8.46; 7.95-8.48; n = 17). ARB affinity estimates based on quantitative autoradiography have yielded similar results (Jin et al, 1997). Affinity estimates based on association and dissociation rate constants yielded similar values as in the competition binding studies, e.g., for candesartan and telmisartan Maillard et al, 2002a).…”
Section: A Radioligand Binding Studiessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of these studies, the various ARBs appear to have the following affinity estimates (pK i or pIC 50 ; median with 95% confidence intervals) at mammalian AT1R: azilsartan (8.51; 4.71-10.94; n = 3), candesartan (8.43; 8.01-8.80; n = 26), eprosartan (8.26; 8.02-8.58; n = 12), irbesartan (8.72; 8.42-8.87; n = 14), losartan (7.71; 7.50-7.73; n = 63), EXP3174 (8.17;; n = 21), olmesartan (8.17; 7.99-8.60; n = 5), telmisartan (8.33; 8.12-8.53; n = 14), and valsartan (8.46; 7.95-8.48; n = 17). ARB affinity estimates based on quantitative autoradiography have yielded similar results (Jin et al, 1997). Affinity estimates based on association and dissociation rate constants yielded similar values as in the competition binding studies, e.g., for candesartan and telmisartan Maillard et al, 2002a).…”
Section: A Radioligand Binding Studiessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Most of this work has been carried out in isolated blood vessels. The vast majority of in vitro studies on ARB effects on ANG-induced vasoconstriction has been performed with isolated rabbit aorta, but some findings have also been reported, e.g., for rat aorta , rat portal vein (Zhang et al, 1993;Morsing et al, 1999), guinea pig aorta (Mizuno et al, 1995;Hashimoto et al, 1997), rabbit mesenteric artery , dog pulmonary artery (Guimarães et al, 2011), pig and human coronary artery (Maassen vandenBrink et al, 1999), or human gastroepiploic artery (Jin et al, 1997) or human subcutaneous microvessels (Garcha et al, 1999); data with compounds that have been tested in multiple preparations indicate that the antagonist potency of a given ARB is comparable across species and vascular beds. On the basis of these studies the various ARBs appear to have the following affinity estimates (pA 2 for surmountable or pD 2 for insurmountable ARBs; median with 95% confidence intervals) at mammalian vascular AT1R ( Fig.…”
Section: Antagonism At Tissue Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exclusive role of sympathetic innervation in determining the vascular response to exogenous noradrenaline provides an explanation why a similar influence of AT 1 receptors has not been observed in most isolated vascular preparations. [25][26][27] Third, Ang II is known to facilitate the release of endogenous noradrenaline by activation of presynaptic AT 1 receptors. 5,6 Because the total postsynaptic availability of noradrenaline results from both, endogenous release and exogenous application, it is feasible that suppression of facilitation by AT 1 blockade increases the dose requirement of infused noradrenaline to maintain equivalent vascular responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), now named as fonsartan, has a sulfonylurea replacement for the tetrazole moiety and 4-alkylthio substituent at imidazole ring. It is highly potent (10 times more potent than losartan) and selective noncompetitive AT 1 antagonist in isolated rabbit aorta and human gastroepiploic arteries 13 . …”
Section: Fig 3: Structural Modification Of S-8308 To Develop Eprosartanmentioning
confidence: 98%