1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb10229.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological investigation into the effects of histamine and histamine analogues on guinea‐pig and rat colon in vitro

Abstract: 1 The effects ofhistamine and specific histamine agonists has been examined on isolated longitudinal colon strips of guinea-pig and rat. 2 Histamine and 2-pyridyl-ethylamine but not 4 methylhistamine produced a concentration-related contractile response in the guinea-pig colon. 3 The H,-antagonist clemizole antagonized competitively the effect of histamine but the H2-antagonist ranitidine did not modify the dose-response curve to histamine in the guinea-pig colon. 4 Atropine, hexamethonium, prazosin and propra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drugs and chemicals utilized in the present study were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). The solutions of histamine (100 μM; [ 26 28 ]), 2-pyridylethylamine (100 μM; [ 29 33 ]) and amthamine (20 μM; [ 34 36 ]) were prepared in ACSF or HEPES-buffered saline. The solutions of bumetanide (10 μM; [ 16 , 37 , 38 ]), CFTR inh -172 (50 μM; [ 39 41 ]), gallein (100 μM; [ 42 44 ]), H89 (10 μM; [ 45 47 ]), KT5720 (1 μM; [ 48 50 ]), bicuculline (30 μM; [ 51 53 ]) and strychnine (1 μM; [ 54 56 ]) were prepared by diluting the stock solutions with ACSF or HEPES-buffered saline; the solvent of stock solutions was dimethyl sulphoxide and its final concentration was 0.01–0.003 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugs and chemicals utilized in the present study were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). The solutions of histamine (100 μM; [ 26 28 ]), 2-pyridylethylamine (100 μM; [ 29 33 ]) and amthamine (20 μM; [ 34 36 ]) were prepared in ACSF or HEPES-buffered saline. The solutions of bumetanide (10 μM; [ 16 , 37 , 38 ]), CFTR inh -172 (50 μM; [ 39 41 ]), gallein (100 μM; [ 42 44 ]), H89 (10 μM; [ 45 47 ]), KT5720 (1 μM; [ 48 50 ]), bicuculline (30 μM; [ 51 53 ]) and strychnine (1 μM; [ 54 56 ]) were prepared by diluting the stock solutions with ACSF or HEPES-buffered saline; the solvent of stock solutions was dimethyl sulphoxide and its final concentration was 0.01–0.003 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective concentration 50% (EC 50 ) was calculated graphically from a plot of log concentration vs. the maximum response (E max ) produced by each agonist in individual experiments. The pA 2 value for antagonism was calculated according to the method of Arunlakshana & Schild (1959), as previously described (Aguilar, Morales-Olivas & Rubio, 1986). For optimum fitting of pA 2 , the maximum response (E max ) and halfmaximal effective concentrations (EC 50 ) of agonists were calculated from concentration-response curves by fitting the experimental data to a logistic-equation by non-linear regression analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the pA2 values was according to Arunlakshana & Schild (1959) as described previously (Aguilar et al 1986). All data are shown as mean standard error of the mean.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%