Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending

Abstract: This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions on target sexual behaviour for people who have been convicted or at risk of sexual offending.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, studies have been carried out. Khan et al (2015) conducted the most recent Cochrane review in this field, including seven prospective controlled trials using either testosterone-suppressing or antipsychotic drugs.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Pharmacological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, studies have been carried out. Khan et al (2015) conducted the most recent Cochrane review in this field, including seven prospective controlled trials using either testosterone-suppressing or antipsychotic drugs.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Pharmacological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, studies have been carried out. Khan et al () conducted the most recent Cochrane review in this field, including seven prospective controlled trials using either testosterone‐suppressing or antipsychotic drugs. Only two studies, using medroxyprogesterone acetate, reported recidivism and found a significant reduction in those taking the drug.…”
Section: Pharmacological Interventions For Sex Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of ethical incommensurability raises its head here.^ [14] context, it should be made clear to offenders that the goals of treatment not always coincide with their own interests, as this satisfies the requirements of both minimizing distress (caused by otherwise deceitful disguising of the true purpose of treatment) and promoting equality (by providing offenders with the same amount of knowledge regarding treatment goals as that possessed by therapists) [18]. Although evidence about the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in treating sex offenders is inconclusive [20,21], Daniel Turner and colleagues nevertheless discuss that Bclinical experience suggests that, for some paraphilic patients, medication is a useful addition to psychotherapeutic interventions and, as such, its use is being recommended by both clinicians and the WFSBP [World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry] guidelines^ [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the control group can be given no treatment or receive a placebo or a reference treatment [11]. The first procedure should only be chosen if the other two are impossible since it does not allow the performance of a double-blind trial.…”
Section: Treatments Studied In the Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%