2015
DOI: 10.14309/00000434-201510001-02172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacological Intervention for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous studies have never explored the effect of terlipressin on renal function parameters in such patients. Considering that terlipressin has been widely used for improving renal function in patients with HRS [34], it might be beneficial in cirrhotic patients with acute GIB and renal dysfunction [35]. By contrast, somatostatin and octreotide seemed to be ineffective or detrimental to renal function in healthy subjects and cirrhotic patients [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies have never explored the effect of terlipressin on renal function parameters in such patients. Considering that terlipressin has been widely used for improving renal function in patients with HRS [34], it might be beneficial in cirrhotic patients with acute GIB and renal dysfunction [35]. By contrast, somatostatin and octreotide seemed to be ineffective or detrimental to renal function in healthy subjects and cirrhotic patients [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A latest meta-analysis [ 36 ] compared terlipressin with placebo and other vasoconstrictor drugs was published on 2017, but it did not compared terlipressin with placebo and did not include the all RCTs. [ 24 , 26 ] Four new meta-analysises [ 37 40 ] compared the influence of different vasoactive drugs for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, but not just terlipressin. There was no updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of terlipressin for HRS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without resolution of the underlying liver disease, however, relapse may occur following their discontinuation and no significant survival benefit has become apparent with these interventions in a recent meta-analysis. 44 Here, we will focus on discussing treatment for HRS type 1 since there are limited high-quality studies assessing the use of vasoconstrictors and albumin for the treatment of HRS type 2. Available data suggest that similar treatment approaches might apply to HRS type 2.…”
Section: Clinical Management Of Hrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since terlipressin is not FDA approved for use in the United States, norepinephrine is a viable alternative and it has been shown to be as effective as terlipressin at doses of 0.5 to 3 mg intravenously per hour. 44,47,48 The combination of midodrine (an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist, dose of 5-15 mg orally every 8 hours 49,50 ) and octreotide (a somatostatin analog, dose of 100-200 µg of subcutaneous octreotide every 8 hours) is also considered an acceptable alternative for patients without central venous access receiving care on the medical floors, although this combination is not considered as effective as terlipressin. 51,52 While there are no generally accepted MAP goals for the treatment of HRS, a meta-analysis of 21 studies revealed that the magnitude of blood pressure elevation with vasopressors was more important than the specific type of vasopressor used.…”
Section: Clinical Management Of Hrsmentioning
confidence: 99%