1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1978.tb17317.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PHARMACOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HISTAMINE RECEPTORS IN MUSCULATURE AND VASCULATURE OF THE DOG TRACHEA in situ

Abstract: 1 The role of histamine H1-and H2-receptors in the musculature and vasculature of the dog trachea was investigated in the blood-perfused trachea in situ. 2 Histamine and acetylcholine caused increases in blood flow (tracheal vasodilatation) and in intraluminal pressure (tracheal constriction) in a dose-dependent manner. Histamine was almost equipotent to acetylcholine in causing tracheal vasodilatation but was about 30 times less potent in causing tracheal constriction. 3 The histamine H2-receptor agonist, dim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presence of mepyramine the dose-response curves for the early blood flow response to dimaprit and histamine were also parallel, but dimaprit was about 750 times less potent than histamine in producing the early blood flow response on a molar basis. Dimaprit has been reported to be about 5 times less potent than histamine in increasing blood flow through the hind limb of the cat (Parsons et al 1977), whereas in the tracheal vascular bed of the dog it has been shown to be about 100 times less potent than histamine in producing vasodilatation (Himori and Taira 1978). Thus, it appears that in the glandular vascular bed histamine H1-receptors are far more predominant than the histamine H2-receptors as compared with other vascular beds.…”
Section: Disoussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the presence of mepyramine the dose-response curves for the early blood flow response to dimaprit and histamine were also parallel, but dimaprit was about 750 times less potent than histamine in producing the early blood flow response on a molar basis. Dimaprit has been reported to be about 5 times less potent than histamine in increasing blood flow through the hind limb of the cat (Parsons et al 1977), whereas in the tracheal vascular bed of the dog it has been shown to be about 100 times less potent than histamine in producing vasodilatation (Himori and Taira 1978). Thus, it appears that in the glandular vascular bed histamine H1-receptors are far more predominant than the histamine H2-receptors as compared with other vascular beds.…”
Section: Disoussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Histamine causes airway contraction through H, -receptors; and in some species, it causes airway dilatation via H2-receptors (9). In the canine airway, however, histamine receptors are exclusively of the H, -type which mediate constrictions (10,11). Recently, it has been reported that H3-receptors which inhibit ACh release are present on the vagus nerve in guinea pig and human airways (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%