1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1995.tb02547.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacologic Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis: Antimicrobial Agents and Immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over several decades, reduced pFN levels have been associated with sepsis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] to the extent that several authors have evaluated the effects of treatment with FN concentrates. [32][33][34] According to Stathakis et al, 21 sex and age are not associated with the concentration of pFN, thus the lack of parity between the septic and control subjects is not considered to affect the results discussed here. There are some situations, such as in cryofibrinogenaemia or intravascular disseminated coagulation, in which pFN can be abnormally low, possibly due to enhanced catabolism of the protein secondary to intravascular fibrin formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Over several decades, reduced pFN levels have been associated with sepsis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] to the extent that several authors have evaluated the effects of treatment with FN concentrates. [32][33][34] According to Stathakis et al, 21 sex and age are not associated with the concentration of pFN, thus the lack of parity between the septic and control subjects is not considered to affect the results discussed here. There are some situations, such as in cryofibrinogenaemia or intravascular disseminated coagulation, in which pFN can be abnormally low, possibly due to enhanced catabolism of the protein secondary to intravascular fibrin formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…2 Some of the reasons for this include intermittent seeding of low numbers of bacteria within the blood stream, the small volumes of blood obtained from infants for culture, and the increasingly common practice of providing intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to mothers of high-risk deliveries. [13][14][15] It is well known that the smaller the blood volume obtained for culture, the lower the chances of recovering organisms. 16,17 Although infants tend to have a somewhat greater magnitude of bacteremia compared with adults-10 to 300 CFU/ml versus 1 to 30 CFU/ml-the amount of blood sampled for culturing from neonates is significantly less than that taken from adults: Ͻ1 ml versus 10 to 30 ml.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,12 In addition, maternal intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis and/or small blood volume collections from infants are cited as possible reasons for the lack of confidence in negative culture results. [13][14][15][16] At Magee-Women's Hospital, preliminary results are generated after 48 hours for blood cultures lacking detectable growth. However, final results for negative blood cultures are not finalized until after 5 days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%