2010
DOI: 10.1086/651603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacologic Advances in the Treatment and Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus

Abstract: There are currently only two drugs approved for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab is a monoclonal antibody for the prevention of RSV in high-risk children and ribavirin is approved for treatment of severe RSV disease, however its effectiveness in improving outcomes is questionable. Over the past 40 years, many obstacles have delayed the development of safe and effective vaccines and treatment regimens. This article reviews these obstacles and presents the novel development strategies used to overc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is presently no clear evidence supporting the routine use of the antiviral ribavirin (114), inhaled or systemic corticosteroids (12,87), or bronchodilators (47) as mainstays of acute therapy in nonimmunosuppressed infants and children. The humanized monoclonal anti-RSV F protein, palivizumab, is approved for prophylactic use in high-risk infants only (41,72), and thus this modality does not presently address the burden of disease among those with no apparent risk factors (55).…”
Section: Human Rsv Disease: Why Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is presently no clear evidence supporting the routine use of the antiviral ribavirin (114), inhaled or systemic corticosteroids (12,87), or bronchodilators (47) as mainstays of acute therapy in nonimmunosuppressed infants and children. The humanized monoclonal anti-RSV F protein, palivizumab, is approved for prophylactic use in high-risk infants only (41,72), and thus this modality does not presently address the burden of disease among those with no apparent risk factors (55).…”
Section: Human Rsv Disease: Why Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IFN-α/β and ribavirin treatments are of relatively poor efficacy in vivo against most RNA viruses as they efficiently blunt IFN-α/β signaling through expression of virulence factors 5 and often escape ribavirin 3 . This added to the fact that ribavirin treatment is raising important toxicity issues, although it was recently approved against severe hRSV disease with controversial benefits 6 . More recently, some virus-specific treatments have been marketed, in particular against influenza virus with the development of neuraminidase inhibitors 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only therapeutic intervention for RSV infection currently available to patients is the use of ribavirin (3), but its use is also limited because of poor efficacy and teratogenicity and the requirement of an aerosol and/or intravenous (i.v.) mode of administration in hospital settings (4). New therapeutic interventions able to lower the viral load, decrease transmission, and prevent lower respiratory complications are needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%