2019
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability and prediction of clinically effective dose of ACT‐774312: A novel CRTH2 antagonist

Abstract: ACT-774312 is an antagonist of the chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper (Th) 2 cells (CRTH2), in development for the treatment of nasal polyposis or other allergic and type-2 inflammatory diseases. Placebo, single doses of 1-1000 mg, or multiple doses of 30-500 mg either once or twice daily for 4 days of ACT-774312 were administered orally to healthy subjects. The single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of ACT-774312 were dose proportional and characterized by a time to att… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on that data, (S)‐72 ( ACT‐774312 ) was selected as a follow‐up of setipiprant ( ACT‐129968 ). The compound was safe and well tolerated in phase 1 clinical studies after single‐ and multiple‐dose administrations [48] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on that data, (S)‐72 ( ACT‐774312 ) was selected as a follow‐up of setipiprant ( ACT‐129968 ). The compound was safe and well tolerated in phase 1 clinical studies after single‐ and multiple‐dose administrations [48] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highly potent CRTH2 antagonist with an excellent overall biological profile together with good pharmacokinetic properties in animals and a low potential to inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 enzymes, was selected as a follow‐up of setipiprant ( ACT‐129968 ) for clinical development. Compound (S)‐72 ( ACT‐774312 ) was safe and well tolerated in phase 1 clinical studies [48] . Following initial exploratory results in nasal polyposis in a phase 2 clinical trial, the company decided not to pursue this indication any further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Several CRTH2 antagonists have been studied in recent years but have shown limited efficacy. 15,16,[27][28][29][30] After the failure of the LUSTER-1 and LUSTER-2 trials of fevipiprant, many clinical developments of CRTH2 antagonists halted. One explanation for these negative results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGD2‐CRTH2 signaling produces a powerful chemotactic effect on eosinophils, leading to Th2‐type inflammation, such as asthma and allergic rhinitis 25,26 . Several CRTH2 antagonists have been studied in recent years but have shown limited efficacy 15,16,27–30 . After the failure of the LUSTER‐1 and LUSTER‐2 trials of fevipiprant, many clinical developments of CRTH2 antagonists halted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model‐guided dose escalation allows extending the classical approach. The targeted dose can be defined as a specific biomarker target such as receptor antagonism or, classically, the determination of the MTD. On a PK level, modeling can guide the implementation of an uptitration regimen by assessing the achievement of approximately 90% of the steady‐state concentration before increasing the dose to assess safety at the current dose for repeated dosing…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%