2015
DOI: 10.1111/epi.13131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of USL261, a midazolam formulation optimized for intranasal delivery, in a randomized study with healthy volunteers

Abstract: SUMMARYObjective: To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of USL261, a midazolam formulation optimized for intranasal delivery, versus midazolam intravenous (IV) solution administered intranasally (MDZ-inj IN) or intravenously (MDZ-inj IV) in healthy adults. Methods: In this phase 1, five-way crossover, open-label study, 25 healthy adults (aged 18-42 years) were randomly assigned to receive 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 mg USL261; 2.5 mg MDZ-inj IV; and 5.0 mg MDZ-inj IN. Blood samples were col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 38 and 44 publications that included reported CL values were identified for gentamicin and midazolam, respectively. These papers reported a total of 66 and 57 CL values for gentamicin and midazolam, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 38 and 44 publications that included reported CL values were identified for gentamicin and midazolam, respectively. These papers reported a total of 66 and 57 CL values for gentamicin and midazolam, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] Drug absorption was reduced and variable due to leakage or precipitation, and subjects complained of discomfort. More recent DZP and MDZ formulations, designed specifically for nasal administration, require only 100-200 mL to deliver a therapeutic dose, 21,22 which is readily accommodated by the nasal cavity. 23 Rate, extent, and consistency of absorption of these formulations compare favorably against rectal DZP, and display equal or earlier onsets of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Rate, extent, and consistency of absorption of these formulations compare favorably against rectal DZP, and display equal or earlier onsets of action. 21,22 Drug delivery is accomplished using spray devices that provide widespread distribution of droplets throughout the nasal cavity, resulting in longer residence times and less leakage, and hence greater bioavailability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase I study, 53 the T max averaged 10-12 minutes at doses from 2.5-7.5 mg (Figure 2A), whereas the absolute bioavailability ranged from 62-73%. In a phase I study, 53 the T max averaged 10-12 minutes at doses from 2.5-7.5 mg (Figure 2A), whereas the absolute bioavailability ranged from 62-73%.…”
Section: Intranasalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximagen, Ltd. (formerly Upsher Smith Laboratories) is developing IN MDZ. In a phase I study, 53 the T max averaged 10-12 minutes at doses from 2.5-7.5 mg (Figure 2A), whereas the absolute bioavailability ranged from 62-73%. At doses up to 7.5 mg, the onset of CNS side effects such as psychomotor impairment and sedation occurred within 15 minutes, but these measures returned to baseline values by 4 hours ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: Intranasalmentioning
confidence: 99%