1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80664-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of tobramycin in cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cystic fibrosis patients appear to display a larger apparent volume of distribution and an increased total body clearance. These data and others (8,9) support the increased antibiotic dosage requirements for treating acute pulmonary exacerbations in these patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Cystic fibrosis patients appear to display a larger apparent volume of distribution and an increased total body clearance. These data and others (8,9) support the increased antibiotic dosage requirements for treating acute pulmonary exacerbations in these patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Pharmacokinetic studies in CF show that the elimination half-life is y2 h [30]. Assuming first-order pharmacokinetics, tobramycin concentrations will fall below 1 mg?L -1 after six half-lives, leaving a period of y12 h when there are sub-inhibitory plasma concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drug association could not explain the variabilities of the pharmacokinetic parameters; indeed, in contrast to cefsulodin, another cephalosporin that is efficient against Pseudomonas strains, the concentration of ceftazidime in plasma is not influenced by the combined treatment with tobramycin (23). Kelly et al (16) suggested that these variations may be caused by the degree of right-sided heart failure present in the patient during the period of treatment. These variabilities could also be due to hemodynamic status and pathological conditions in hospitalized patients in ICUs and could explain the difference between CLR of ceftazidime and CLc in some patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were collected from the arm contralateral to the arm used for drug administration (i.v. infusion) immediately before and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 90 min and 2, 4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22, and 24 h after each administration. Plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%