Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13318-016-0330-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Oral and Intravenous Oseltamivir Treatment of Severe Influenza B Virus Infection Requiring Organ Replacement Therapy

Abstract: In severe cases with multi-organ failure, administration of 100 mg intravenous oseltamivir twice-daily provided reliable drug concentrations, as opposed to renoprotective and oral dosing, thereby minimizing the risk of treatment failure and drug resistance. Evidence-based pediatric dosing recommendations and effective intravenous antiviral treatment modalities are needed for intensive care patients with life-threatening influenza disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ViVI Disease Severity Score also allows consistent measurements of disease severity when following individual patients over time, as would be the case in clinical trials [40]. Follow-up assessments are useful whenever standardized severity data need to be recaptured over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ViVI Disease Severity Score also allows consistent measurements of disease severity when following individual patients over time, as would be the case in clinical trials [40]. Follow-up assessments are useful whenever standardized severity data need to be recaptured over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the standard operating procedures, patients with a physician diagnosis of ILI and/or fulfilling predefined case criteria (body temperature ≥38°C and ≥1 respiratory symptom) admitted to the emergency department (ED) or pediatric inpatient wards, participated in the QM program [30][31][32][33][34]. Independent of routine clinical care, a specifically trained QM team obtained nasopharyngeal samples and performed standardized clinical assessments using the ViVI Disease Severity Score in line with WHO criteria for uncomplicated and complicated influenza [30,35,40].…”
Section: Cohort Design and Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ViVI Score mobile application provides a uniform approach to defining ad hoc disease severity at any given time point, based on extensive literature review as well as WHO Criteria for uncomplicated and complicated influenza . The ViVI Score consists of nine unweighted symptoms/items reflecting uncomplicated disease (DSU1‐9) plus 13 weighted items reflecting complicated disease (DSC 1‐13) resulting in overall scores ranging from 0‐48 . Data formats and terminologies are fully compliant with Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and regulatory requirements …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality improvement programmes focused on optimizing treatment and prevention efforts depending on a patient's individual status will benefit from timely diagnostics and consistent use of standardized measures and operating procedures . Severity measures thus must be sufficiently granular to capture disease progression in patients with very mild to very severe disease, including within the intensive care unit …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%